Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27841316›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

3D Mass Spectrometry Imaging Reveals a Very Heterogeneous Drug Distribution in Tumors.

S Giordano, L Morosi, P Veglianese, S A Licandro, R Frapolli, M Zucchetti, G Cappelletti, L Falciola, V Pifferi, S Visentin and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Spatial and single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals changes in gene expression in response to drug perturbation in rat kidney.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Biological Systems.Annual review of physical chemistry · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

S GiordanoEnvironmental Health Sciences Department, Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Via La Masa 19, 20156 Milano, Italy.
L MorosiOncology Department, Cancer Pharmacology Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Via La Masa 19, 20156 Milano, Italy.
P VeglianeseNeuroscience Department, Biology of Neurodegenerative Disorders Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Via La Masa 19, 20156 Milano, Italy.
S A LicandroOncology Department, Cancer Pharmacology Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Via La Masa 19, 20156 Milano, Italy.
R FrapolliOncology Department, Cancer Pharmacology Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Via La Masa 19, 20156 Milano, Italy.
M ZucchettiOncology Department, Cancer Pharmacology Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Via La Masa 19, 20156 Milano, Italy.
G CappellettiChemistry Department, University of Milano, Via Golgi 19, 20133 Milano, Italy.
L FalciolaChemistry Department, University of Milano, Via Golgi 19, 20133 Milano, Italy.
V PifferiChemistry Department, University of Milano, Via Golgi 19, 20133 Milano, Italy.
S VisentinDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Science, University of Torino, Via Nizza 52, 10126 Torino, Italy.
M D'IncalciOncology Department, Cancer Pharmacology Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Via La Masa 19, 20156 Milano, Italy.
E DavoliEnvironmental Health Sciences Department, Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Via La Masa 19, 20156 Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass Spectrometry Imaging (MSI) is a widespread technique used to qualitatively describe in two dimensions the distribution of endogenous or exogenous compounds within tissue sections. Absolute quantification of drugs using MSI is a recent challenge that just in the last years has started to be addressed. Starting from a two dimensional MSI protocol, we developed a three-dimensional pipeline to study drug penetration in tumors and to develop a new drug quantification method by MALDI MSI. Paclitaxel distribution and concentration in different tumors were measured in a 3D model of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM), which is known to be a very heterogeneous neoplasm, highly resistant to different drugs. The 3D computational reconstruction allows an accurate description of tumor PTX penetration, adding information about the heterogeneity of tumor drug distribution due to the complex microenvironment. The use of an internal standard, homogenously sprayed on tissue slices, ensures quantitative results that are similar to those obtained using HPLC. The 3D model gives important information about the drug concentration in different tumor sub-volumes and shows that the great part of each tumor is not reached by the drug, suggesting the concept of pseudo-resistance as a further explanation for ineffective therapies and tumors relapse.

Indexed as

Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCell Line, TumorChromatography, High Pressure LiquidFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMesotheliomaMetal NanoparticlesMiceMice, NudeNeoplasmsPaclitaxelTitaniumTransplantation, HeterologousAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicPaclitaxelTitaniumtitanium dioxide

Identifiers

PMID27841316
PMCPMC5107992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.