Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27841117›Full record

GuidelineThe Journal of laryngology and otology2016

Quality of life considerations in head and neck cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines.

S N Rogers, C Semple, M Babb, G Humphris

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in The Journal of laryngology and otology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: main results of a cluster preference randomised controlled trial.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Quality of life in cancer patients with or without medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  13. Correlations between long-term quality of life and patient needs and concerns following head and neck cancer treatment and the impact of psychological distress. A multicentric cross-sectional study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  14. European white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Integrative care of the patient with head and neck cancer.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S N RogersEvidence-Based Practice Research Centre,Faculty of Health,Edge Hill University,Ormskirk,UK.
C SempleDepartment of Head and Neck Cancer,Cancer Services, South Eastern Health & Social Care Trust,Belfast,UK.
M BabbNCRI Head and Neck Clinical Studies Group,NCIN Head and Neck Site Specific Clinical Reference Group,B16 - Complex Head and Neck Clinical Reference Group,Chesterfield,Derbyshire,UK.
G HumphrisMedical School, University of St Andrews,St Andrews,UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is the official guideline endorsed by the specialty associations involved in the care of head and neck cancer patients in the UK. It identifies the current evidence base and role of health-related quality of life assessment for this group of patients. Recommendations • Health-related quality of life is integral to treatment planning, refining treatment protocols, and more personalised follow-up support. (G) • Health-related quality of life and patient concerns should be regularly assessed during patient care. (G) • Health-related quality of life assessment and patient concerns on an individual patient basis can be helpful to trigger multi-professional support and interventions. (G).

Indexed as

Quality of LifeHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationLaryngeal NeoplasmsMouth NeoplasmsOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPatient Care PlanningUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID27841117
PMCPMC4873941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.