Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27841091›Full record

ReviewThe journal of spinal cord medicine2017

Passive cycling in neurorehabilitation after spinal cord injury: A review.

Raffaele Nardone, Andrea Orioli, Stefan Golaszewski, Francesco Brigo, Luca Sebastianelli, Yvonne Höller, Vanessa Frey, Eugen Trinka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Arm Cycling Combined with Passive Leg Cycling Enhances VOTopics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Raffaele Nardonea Department of Neurology , Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University , Salzburg , Austria.
Andrea Oriolib Department of Neurology , Franz Tappeiner Hospital , Merano , Italy.
Stefan Golaszewskia Department of Neurology , Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University , Salzburg , Austria.
Francesco Brigob Department of Neurology , Franz Tappeiner Hospital , Merano , Italy.
Luca Sebastianellie Department of Neurorehabilitation , Hospital of Vipiteno , Italy.
Yvonne Höllera Department of Neurology , Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University , Salzburg , Austria.
Vanessa Freya Department of Neurology , Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University , Salzburg , Austria.
Eugen Trinkaa Department of Neurology , Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University , Salzburg , Austria.
Paracelsus Medical University · ATChristian Doppler Klinik · ATUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CONTEXT/

objectivePassive cycling (PC) may represent a potential alternative neurorehabilitation program for patients who are too weak or medically unstable to repeatedly practice active movements. We review here the most important animal and human studies addressing PC after spinal cord injury (SCI).

methodsA MEDLINE search was performed using following terms: "passive", "cycling", "pedaling", "pedalling","spinal cord injury".

resultsExperimental studies revealed that PC modulated spinal reflex and reduced spasticity. PC also reduced autonomic dysreflexia and elicited cardio-protective effects. Increased levels of mRNA for brain-derived neurotrophic factor, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-4 were found. In contrast, human studies failed to show an effect of PC on spasticity reduction and did not support its application for prevention of cardiovascular disease-related secondary complications.

conclusionAvailable evidence to support the use of PC as standard treatment in patients with SCI is still rather limited. Since it is conceivable that PC motion could elicit sensory inputs to activate cortical structures and induce cortical plasticity changes leading to improved lower limb motor performance, further carefully designed prospective studies in subjects with SCI are needed.

Indexed as

AnimalsExercise TherapyHumansNerve Growth FactorsNeurological RehabilitationReflexSpinal Cord InjuriesNerve Growth FactorsCyclingExercisePassiveSpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID27841091
PMCPMC5376131
OpenAlexW2556232936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.