Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27840965›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2016

Breast cancer stem cells expressing different stem cell markers exhibit distinct biological characteristics.

Jun Shao, Wei Fan, Biao Ma, Yiping Wu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. CAV1 inhibits XcTranslational oncology · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Tumour Stem Cells in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. XIAOPI Formula Inhibits Breast Cancer Stem CellsFrontiers in pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun ShaoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Wuhan Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, P.R. China.
Wei FanDepartment of Breast Cancer, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, P.R. China.
Biao MaDepartment of Breast Cancer, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, P.R. China.
Yiping WuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Wuhan Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, P.R. China.
Hubei Cancer Hospital · CNTongji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification and isolation of breast cancer stem cells (CSCs) based on CD44/CD24 expression and/or enzymatic activity of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1). However, the differences among the CD44+/CD24‑/low cells, ALDH1+ cells and the overlap between the sub‑populations have not been frequently investigated. Thus, it is imperative to improve the understanding of breast CSC with different stem markers. CD44+/CD24‑/low, ALDH1+ and ALDH1+CD44+/CD24‑/low cell populations were isolated from fresh breast cancer tissues and analyzed by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. Mammosphere formation, cell proliferation assay and Transwell experiments, were used to analyze self‑renewal, proliferation and invasion, respectively, for each sub‑population. Finally, in vivo experimentation in mice was performed to evaluate the tumorigenic abilities of the sub‑populations. The sub‑populations of CD44+/CD24‑/low, ALDH1+ and ALDH1+CD44+/CD24‑/low in human breast cancer cells, represented the 7.2, 4.6 and 1.5% of the total tumor cell population, respectively. ALDH1+CD44+/CD24‑/low cells had the strongest ability of self‑renewal, invasion, proliferation and tumorigenicity compared with the other sub‑populations (P<0.05). In conclusion, different phenotypes of CD44+/CD24‑/low, ALDH1+ and ALDH1+CD44+/CD24‑/low were isolated and demonstrated that breast CSCs are heterogeneous, and they exhibit distinct biological characteristics. As ALDH1+CD44+/CD24‑/low cells demonstrated the strongest stem‑like properties, it may be a useful specific stem cell marker. The utilization of more reliable biomarkers to distinguish the breast CSC pool will be important for the development of specific target therapies for breast cancer.

Indexed as

BiomarkersAdultAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHeterograftsHumansImmunophenotypingMiceNeoplastic Stem CellsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID27840965
PMCPMC5355694
OpenAlexW2543270089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.