ArticleSummer Computer Simulation Conference : (SCSC 2015) : 2015 Summer Simulation Multi-Conference (SummerSim'15) : Chicago, Illinois, USA, 26-29 July 2015. Summer Computer Simulation Conference (2015 : Chicago, Illinois)2015
Simulation-based Bayesian Analysis of Complex Data.
Article in Summer Computer Simulation Conference : (SCSC 2015) : 2015 Summer Simulation Multi-Conference (SummerSim'15) : Chicago, Illinois, USA, 26-29 July 2015. Summer Computer Simulation Conference (2015 : Chicago, Illinois), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microsimulation Model Calibration with Approximate Bayesian Computation in R: A Tutorial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our ability to collect large datasets is growing rapidly. Such richness of data offers great promise in terms of addressing detailed scientific questions in great depth. However, this benefit is not without scientific difficulty: many traditional analysis methods become computationally intractable for very large datasets. However, one can frequently still simulate data from scientific models for which direct calculation is no longer possible. In this paper we propose a Bayesian perspective for such analyses, and argue for the advantage of a simulation-based approximate Bayesian method that remains tractable when tractability of other methods is lost. This method, which is known as "approximate Bayesian computation" [ABC], has now been used in a variety of contexts, such as the analysis of tumor data (a tumor being a complex population of cells), and the analysis of human genetic variation data (which arise from a population of individual people). We review a number of ABC methods, with specific attention to the use of ABC in agent-based models, and give pointers to software that allows straightforward implementation of the ABC approach. In this way we demonstrate the utility of simulation-based analyses of large datasets within a rigorous statistical framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27840859PMC5102508What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.