Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27840777›Full record

ArticleThe journal of experimental secondary science2014

Minimizing Systematic Errors in Quantitative High Throughput Screening Data Using Standardization, Background Subtraction, and Non-Parametric Regression.

Mitas Ray, Keith Shockley, Grace Kissling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of experimental secondary science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mitas RayWilliam G. Enloe High School, 128 Clarendon Crescent, Raleigh, NC 27610.
Keith ShockleyNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS/NIH), 111 TW Alexander Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Grace KisslingNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS/NIH), 111 TW Alexander Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.

Funding

Analysis of Quantitative High Throughput Screening DataZIAES102865 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHOCKLEY, KEITH · 2010 to 2025
$2.8M
Identifying And Evaluating Sources Of Variability In Rodent StudiesZIAES045003 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KISSLING, GRACE E · 2009 to 2017
$712k
SOURCES OF VARIABILITY IN TUMOR INCIDENCE IN LONG TERM RODENT STUDIESZ01ES045003 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KISSLING, GRACE E · 1997 to 2008
$127k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES045003Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES102865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative high throughput screening (qHTS) has the potential to transform traditional toxicological testing by greatly increasing throughput and lowering costs on a per chemical basis. However, before qHTS data can be utilized for toxicity assessment, systematic errors such as row, column, cluster, and edge effects in raw data readouts need to be removed. Normalization seeks to minimize effects of systematic errors. Linear (LN) normalization, such as standardization and background removal, minimizes row and column effects. Alternatively, local weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOESS or LO) minimizes cluster effects. Both approaches have been used to normalize large scale data sets in other contexts. A new method is proposed in this paper to combine these two approaches (LNLO) to account for systematic errors within and between experiments. Heat maps illustrate that the LNLO method is more effective in removing systematic error than either the LN or the LO approach alone. All analyses were performed on an estrogen receptor agonist assay data set generated as part of the Tox21 collaboration.

Identifiers

PMID27840777
PMCPMC5102623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.