SynthesisMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2016
Promoter Polymorphism (-174, G/C) of Interleukin-6 and Arterial Thromboembolic Events: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Polymorphisms of the interleukin-6 (Health science reports · 2023Article
- Dual Effect of IL-6 -174 G/C Polymorphism and Promoter Methylation in the Risk of Coronary Artery Disease Among South Indians.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2019Article
- Association Between Polymorphisms of Interleukin 1 Family Genes and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Article
- Association Between ABCB1 Gene Polymorphism and Renal Function in Patients with Hypertension: A Case-Control Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction are fatal diseases and are among the top 10 causes of death in Korea, including arterial thromboembolic events. Many previous studies have described the function of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in arterial thromboembolic events and the association between promoter single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (rs1800795; -174, G/C) of the IL-6 gene. However, these results were controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to more precisely assess the association between the SNP of the IL-6 gene and susceptibility to arterial thromboembolic events. MATERIAL AND METHODS We used PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS) electronic databases. Comprehensive Meta-analysis software (Corporation, NJ) was used to evaluate the relationship between rs1800795 SNP of IL-6 gene and risk of arterial thromboembolic events. Odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and P value were also calculated. The 13 eligible studies were analyzed in the meta-analysis. RESULTS The present meta-analysis found that rs1800795 SNP of IL-6 gene is not significantly associated with susceptibility to arterial thromboembolic events (C allele vs. G allele, OR=1.04, 95% CI=0.91-1.19, P=0.619; CC vs. CG+GG, OR=1.09, 95% CI=0.91-1.31, P=0.364; CC+CG vs. GG, OR=0.97, 95% CI=0.78-1.21, P=0.763, respectively), and the SNP of IL-6 gene also did not show any significant association with ischemic stroke or myocardial infarction (P>0.05 in each model). CONCLUSIONS We found that rs1800795 SNP of IL-6 gene was not related to arterial thromboembolic events. However, further study will be needed to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.