Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27840364›Full record

ReviewGut and liver2017

25 Years of Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Comprehensive Review.

Daniel S Strand, Daejin Kim, David A Peura

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut and liver, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07326904 (A Multi-Center, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Symptom Relief and Safety After Using Fexuprazan 40 Mg Compared to Esomeprazole 40 Mg in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 294 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
294citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
29.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07326904 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Multi-Center, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Symptom Relief and Safety After Using Fexuprazan 40 Mg Compared to Esomeprazole 40 Mg in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled145ConditionsGastro Oesophageal Reflux DiseaseArmsFexuprazan, Esomeprazole
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

294 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 641 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. First-line Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Infection with High-Dose Amoxicillin and Vonoprazan: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Guidelines on optimizing the use of proton pump inhibitors: PPI stewardship.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Guideline
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

234 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel S StrandDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Daejin KimDivision of Gastroenterology, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
David A PeuraDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
University of Virginia · USDaegu Fatima Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were clinically introduced more than 25 years ago and have since proven to be invaluable, safe, and effective agents for the management of a variety of acid-related disorders. Although all members in this class act in a similar fashion, inhibiting active parietal cell acid secretion, there are slight differences among PPIs relating to their pharmacokinetic properties, metabolism, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved clinical indications. Nevertheless, each is effective in managing gastroesophageal reflux disease and uncomplicated or complicated peptic ulcer disease. Despite their overall efficacy, PPIs do have some limitations related to their short plasma half-lives and requirement for meal-associated dosing, which can lead to breakthrough symptoms in some individuals, especially at night. Longer-acting PPIs and technology to prolong conventional PPI activity have been developed to specifically address these limitations and may improve clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDrug Therapy, CombinationGastroesophageal RefluxHalf-LifeHelicobacter InfectionsHumansPeptic UlcerProton Pump InhibitorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalProton Pump InhibitorsIndicationsPharmacokineticsProton pump inhibitorsReviewRisk

Identifiers

PMID27840364
PMCPMC5221858
OpenAlexW2550831966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.