Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27840344›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in health sciences2016

Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Exhaled Breath of Workers Exposed to Crystalline Silica Dust by SPME-GC-MS.

Mahdi Jalali, Mohammad Javad Zare Sakhvidi, Abdulrahman Bahrami, Nima Berijani, Hussein Mahjub

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in health sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mahdi JalaliDepartment of Occupational Health, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran.
Mohammad Javad Zare SakhvidiDepartment of Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Yazd University of Medical Science, Yazd, Iran.
Abdulrahman BahramiExcellence Center for Occupational Health, Research Centre for Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Science, Hamadan, Iran. bahrami@umsha.ac.ir.
Nima BerijaniExcellence Center for Occupational Health, Research Centre for Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Science, Hamadan, Iran.
Hussein MahjubDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Research Centre for Health Sciences, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences · IRBirjand University of Medical Sciences · IRYazd University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSilicosis is considered an oxidative stress related disease that can lead to the development of lung cancer. In this study, our purpose was to analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the exhaled breath of workers exposed to silica containing dust and compare peak area of these compounds with silicosis patients and healthy volunteers (smokers and nonsmokers) groups.

methodsIn this cross sectional case-control study, the exhaled breath of 69 subjects including workers exposed to silica (n=20), silicosis patient (n=4), healthy non-smoker (n=20) and healthy smoker (n=25) were analyzed. We collected breath samples using 3-liter Tedlar bags. The VOCs were extracted with solid phase micro-extraction (SPME) and analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Personal exposure intensity was measured according to NIOSH 7601 method. Respiratory parameters were measured using spirometry.

resultsSeventy percent and 100% of the exposures to crystalline silica dust exceeded from 8 h TWA ACGIH TLVs in case and positive control groups, respectively. A significant negative correlation was found between dust exposure intensity and FEV1/FVC when exposure and positive control groups were studied in a group (r2=-0.601, P<0.001). Totally, forty VOCs were found in all exhaled breath samples. Among the VOCs, the mean of peak area acetaldehyde, hexanal, nonanal, decane, pentad cane, 2-propanol and 3-hydroxy-2-butanone were higher in exhaled breath of the workers exposed to silica and silicosis patient compared to the healthy smoker and nonsmoker controls. In some cases the difference was significant (P<0.05).

conclusionsThe analysis of some VOCs in exhaled breath of subjects is appropriate biomarker to determine of exposure to silica.

Indexed as

Oxidative StressAdultAir Pollutants, OccupationalBiomarkersBreath TestsCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDustGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansLungLung NeoplasmsMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureRespirationAir Pollutants, OccupationalBiomarkersDustSilicon DioxideVolatile Organic CompoundsBiomarkersBreath testsOccupational exposureOxidative stressSilicosisVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID27840344
PMCPMC7191029
OpenAlexW2529422398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.