Updated Federal Recommendations for HIV Prevention With Adults and Adolescents With HIV in The United States: The Pivotal Role of Nurses.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. "How much more on the nurse?:" a qualitative analysis of inpatient nurses' perspectives on offering HIV testing.BMC nursing · 2025
   Article
2. Psychosocial Interventions by Nurses for Patients with HIV/ AIDS: A Systematic Review.Journal of caring sciences · 2023
   Review
3. Comparison of in vitro fertilization cycles in couples with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection versus noninfected couples through a retrospective matched case-control study.F&S reports · 2021
   Article
4. Nursing Practice to Support People Living With HIV With Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence: A Qualitative Study.The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care : JANAC
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as