Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27839782›Full record

ReviewJournal of affective disorders2017

Symptomatology and predictors of antidepressant efficacy in extended responders to a single ketamine infusion.

Steven J Pennybaker, Mark J Niciu, David A Luckenbaugh, Carlos A Zarate

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of affective disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Exploring Predictors of Ketamine Response in Adolescent Treatment-Resistant Depression.Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology · 2024
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Dose-Related Effects of Adjunctive Ketamine in Taiwanese Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Can Intraoperative Low-DoseFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Steven J PennybakerNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, Building 10/CRC, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Mark J NiciuNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, Building 10/CRC, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
David A LuckenbaughNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, Building 10/CRC, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Carlos A ZarateNational Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Experimental Therapeutics and Pathophysiology Branch, Building 10/CRC, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: zaratec@mail.nih.gov.

Funding

Glutamatergic Modulators for Rapid & Sustained Antidepressant EffectZIAMH002857 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI ZARATE, CARLOS · 2009 to 2025
$55.0M
Target validation of novel therapeutic agents in mood disordersZIAMH002927 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI ZARATE, CARLOS · 2010 to 2025
$37.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntidepressant response to a single subanesthetic dose infusion of the glutamatergic modulator ketamine is transient in most depressed patients; however, a minority continue to experience an extended response. This study examined depressive symptoms and potential clinical predictors of extended response to ketamine in subjects with mood disorders.

methodsSubjects were diagnosed with either major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar depression. All subjects were treatment-resistant and experiencing a major depressive episode of at least moderate severity. MDD subjects were unmedicated and those with bipolar depression were receiving therapeutic-dose lithium or valproate. All subjects received a single 0.5mg/kg ketamine infusion. Data were collected pre-infusion (baseline) and at days one, 14, and 28 post-infusion.

resultsTwelve of 93 (12.9%) participants continued to meet response criteria (50% reduction in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score) at two weeks. All depressive symptoms assessed by the MADRS were improved at two weeks in ketamine responders except for sleep duration/depth. A positive family history of alcohol use disorder in a first-degree relative (FHP) and greater dissociation during the infusion were associated with better antidepressant response at two weeks. Improved measures of apparent sadness, reported sadness, inability to feel, and difficulty concentrating at day 1 correlated most strongly with antidepressant effects at two weeks. LIMITATIONS: Post-hoc design, small sample size, diagnostic heterogeneity.

conclusionsStatic (FHP) and dynamic (improved depressive symptoms) factors may be clinically useful in predicting whether a patient will have an extended response to ketamine.

Indexed as

AdultAlcohol-Related DisordersAntidepressive AgentsBipolar DisorderFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousKetamineLithiumMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesTreatment OutcomeValproic AcidAntidepressive AgentsKetamineLithiumValproic AcidAntidepressantBipolar depressionGlutamatergic modulatorKetamineMajor depressive disorderNMDA receptor antagonistTreatment-resistant depression

Identifiers

PMID27839782
PMCPMC5154889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.