Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27838901›Full record

SynthesisDrugs in R&D2017

Efficacy of Immunobiologic and Small Molecule Inhibitor Drugs for Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

André Vicente Esteves de Carvalho, Rodrigo Pereira Duquia, Bernardo Lessa Horta, Renan Rangel Bonamigo

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs in R&D, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Value drivers of development stage biopharma companies.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Targeting IL-17 in psoriatic arthritis.European journal of rheumatology · 2017
    Review
  13. The content validity of the PSS in patients with plaque psoriasis.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2017
    Article
  14. Global & regional health technology assessment
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

André Vicente Esteves de CarvalhoIrmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Ramiro Barcelos 1176/702, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-002, Brazil. avecarvalho@me.com.
Rodrigo Pereira DuquiaIrmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Ramiro Barcelos 1176/702, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-002, Brazil.
Bernardo Lessa HortaUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Renan Rangel BonamigoIrmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Ramiro Barcelos 1176/702, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-002, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BRIrmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Pelotas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsoriasis is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease for which treatment has evolved over the past few years due to the introduction of immunobiologic and small molecule inhibitor medications. A better understanding of the comparative efficacies of drugs may help doctors to choose the most appropriate treatment for patients.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of immunobiologic and small molecule inhibitor drugs for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. DATA SOURCES: The EMBASE, PUBMED, LILACS, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.org databases were searched for trials published to 21 July 2016. STUDY SELECTION: Only randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy of immunobiologics or small molecule inhibitors for moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis were selected by two independent authors. No restrictions were used. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors independently extracted the data and a random-effects model meta-analysis was performed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 was considered the primary outcome, measured at the primary endpoint of each study.

resultsThirty-eight studies were included in our analysis. The overall pooled effect favored biologics and small molecule inhibitors over placebo (risk difference [RD] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.60). Ixekizumab at a dose of 160 mg on week 0 and then every 2 weeks (RD 0.84, 95% CI 0.81-0.88), brodalumab 210 mg (RD 0.79, 95% CI 0.76-0.82), infliximab 5 mg/kg (RD 0.76, 95% CI 0.73-0.79), and secukinumab 300 mg (RD 0.76, 95% CI 0.71-0.81) showed a greater chance of response (PASI 75) when compared with placebo. LIMITATIONS: The methodology of a traditional meta-analysis does not allow for drugs to be ranked. Included studies used short-term endpoints (10-16 weeks) to evaluate the primary outcome, therefore long-term efficacy could not be determined. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The anti-IL-17 drugs brodalumab, ixekizumab and secukinumab showed an equal or greater chance of helping patients achieve a 75% improvement on PASI compared with other reviewed drugs.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansPsoriasisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSmall Molecule LibrariesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedbrodalumabixekizumabsecukinumabSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID27838901
PMCPMC5318320
OpenAlexW2549511634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.