Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27838866›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2017

Effects of proactive interference on non-verbal working memory.

Marilyn Cyr, Derek E Nee, Eric Nelson, Thea Senger, John Jonides, Chara Malapani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Proactive interference and the development of working memory.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of Exercise on Memory Interference in Neuropsychiatric Disorders.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marilyn CyrDivision of Cognitive Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Dr, New York, NY, 10032, USA. cyrmari@nyspi.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1605-0427
Derek E NeeDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Eric NelsonDivision of Cognitive Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Dr, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Thea SengerDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
John JonidesDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Chara MalapaniDivision of Cognitive Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Dr, New York, NY, 10032, USA.

Funding

Neuroimaging Different Cognitive-Control Processes in Normals and SchizophrenicsR21MH098271 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI MALAPANI, CHARIKLIA · 2012 to 2014
$439k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH098271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory (WM) is a cognitive system responsible for actively maintaining and processing relevant information and is central to successful cognition. A process critical to WM is the resolution of proactive interference (PI), which involves suppressing memory intrusions from prior memories that are no longer relevant. Most studies that have examined resistance to PI in a process-pure fashion used verbal material. By contrast, studies using non-verbal material are scarce, and it remains unclear whether the effect of PI is domain-general or whether it applies solely to the verbal domain. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of PI in visual WM using both objects with high and low nameability. Using a Directed-Forgetting paradigm, we varied discriminability between WM items on two dimensions, one verbal (high-nameability vs. low-nameability objects) and one perceptual (colored vs. gray objects). As in previous studies using verbal material, effects of PI were found with object stimuli, even after controlling for verbal labels being used (i.e., low-nameability condition). We also found that the addition of distinctive features (color, verbal label) increased performance in rejecting intrusion probes, most likely through an increase in discriminability between content-context bindings in WM.

Indexed as

Proactive InhibitionAdultDiscrimination, PsychologicalHumansMemory, Short-TermMental RecallRecognition, PsychologyVisual PerceptionDirected forgettingInterference/inhibition in memory retrievalObject recognitionRecollectionWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID27838866
PMCPMC5292286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.