Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27838848›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2017

Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are not interchangeable to assess the Achilles tendon cross-sectional-area.

Annika Kruse, Savvas Stafilidis, Markus Tilp

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A review of methods to measure tendon dimensions.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Annika KruseInstitute of Sports Science, University of Graz, Mozartgasse 14, 8010, Graz, Austria.
Savvas StafilidisCentre of Sport Science, University of Vienna, Auf der Schmelz 6a, 1150, Vienna, Austria. savvas.stafylidis@univie.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3960-1551
Markus TilpInstitute of Sports Science, University of Graz, Mozartgasse 14, 8010, Graz, Austria.
University of Graz · ATUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe major aim of this study was to compare ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements of the Achilles tendon cross-sectional area (CSA). Further aims were to conduct reliability analyses and to assess the influence of transducer pressure on the tendon properties in US measurements.

methodsThe Achilles tendon CSA of 15 participants was assessed at two positions with US and MRI by use of a standardized protocol. Method comparison was performed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t test. Reliability was assessed by coefficients of variation (CV), intraclass correlation (ICC

resultsMean US measurements provided a ~5.5% smaller CSA compared to MRI measurements. Intra-rater reliability analyses of US demonstrated CV values of 1.5-4.9%, ICC of 0.89-0.97, SEM and MDC

conclusionsOur findings show that US and MRI cannot be used interchangeably for Achilles tendon CSA assessments, however, each imaging modality separately is reliable to assess this property. Pressure applied on the transducer during US measurements causes alterations of the tendon's morphology and should be avoided.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonographyAchilles TendonAdultFemaleHumansMaleSensitivity and SpecificityAchilles tendonCross-sectional areaMagnetic resonance imagingReproducibilityUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID27838848
PMCPMC5306331
OpenAlexW2554512325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.