Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27838810›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2017

Airway Management During Upper GI Endoscopic Procedures: State of the Art Review.

Basavana Goudra, Preet Mohinder Singh

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. High-flow oxygenWorld journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Endo-anesthesia: a primer.Gastroenterology report · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Basavana GoudraPerelman School of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. goudrab@uphs.upenn.edu.
Preet Mohinder SinghDepartment of Anesthesia, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the growing popularity of propofol mediated deep sedation for upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures, challenges are being felt and appreciated. Research suggests that management of the airway is anything but routine in this setting. Although many studies and meta-analyses have demonstrated the safety of propofol sedation administered by registered nurses under the supervision of gastroenterologists (likely related to the lighter degrees of sedation than those provided by anesthesia providers and is under medicolegal controversy in the United States), there is no agreement on the optimum airway management for procedures such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Failure to rescue an airway at an appropriate time has led to disastrous consequences. Inability to evaluate and appreciate the risk factors for aspiration can ruin the day for both the patient and the health care providers. This review apprises the reader of various aspects of airway management relevant to the practice of sedation during upper GI endoscopy. New devices and modification of existing devices are discussed in detail. Recognizing the fact that appropriate monitoring is important for timely recognition and management of potential airway disasters, these issues are explored thoroughly.

Indexed as

Airway ManagementAnesthetics, IntravenousCapnographyCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeDeep SedationElectric ImpedanceEndoscopy, Digestive SystemHumansIntubationMasksMonitoring, IntraoperativePatient PositioningPropofolRespiratory AspirationAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofolAdvanced endoscopyAirway devices endoscopyAnesthesiaAnesthesia tips endoscopyERCP

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.