ArticleInternational orthopaedics2017
In-hospital costs for total hip replacement performed using the supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip replacement surgical technique.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03746925 (Randomized Control Trial Comparing Short-term Outcomes After Direct Anterior and SuperPATH Approaches), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Control Trial Comparing Short-term Outcomes After Direct Anterior and SuperPATH Approaches
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of clinical outcomes of supercapsular percutaneously-assisted approach total hip arthroplasty versus conventional posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPath) versus posterolateral total hip arthroplasty in bilateral osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a pilot clinical trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Trial
- [Randomized controlled trial of comparison between the SuperPATH and posterolateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2018Trial
- SuperPATH-Current Status of Evidence and Further Investigations: A Scoping Review and Quality Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Radiographic results on acetabular cup placement with the SuperPath technique: a retrospective study of 756 cases.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Two year follow up of supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPath) versus mini-incision posterolateral total hip arthroplasty for hip osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip arthroplasty versus conventional posterior approach: Comparison of early functional results.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2020Article
- Comment on Saku et al.: Reasons and risk factors for ninety day re-admission following primary total knee arthroplasty in a high-volume centre.International orthopaedics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPath) surgical technique for total hip replacement (THR) is a tissue-sparing approach that has been shown to improve key variables associated with the economic burden of THR (e.g., length of stay, readmissions). To date, no studies have examined the economic impact of using this technique in the United States. The objective of this study was to compare the in-hospital costs of this technique to all other THRs performed in a large hospital system in the United States.
methodsThe costing database for a large hospital system was retrospectively searched for all in-hospital costs associated with primary THRs performed between January 2013 and September 2015. Data for all SuperPath THRs (group A) were compared to that of all other THRs performed at centres within the hospital system (group B).
resultsUse of the SuperPath technique resulted in significant overall in-hospital cost reductions of 15.0 % (p < 0.000), including reductions in operating room costs of 17.3 % (p < 0.000), physical/occupational therapy costs of 26.8 % (p = 0.005), and pharmacy costs of 25.3 % (p < 0.000). Length of stay (1.2 vs. 2.6 days), transfusion rates (1.9 vs. 15.8 %), and 30-day readmission rates (0.4 vs. 2.9 %) were also lower in group A.
conclusionsThe use of this tissue-sparing surgical technique resulted in reductions in in-hospital costs, length of stay, and readmissions when compared to all other THRs performed in a large hospital system in the United States.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.