Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27838363›Full record

ReviewProgress in biophysics and molecular biology2017

The tale of SSB.

Piero R Bianco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The RecBC complex protects single-stranded DNA gaps during lesion bypass.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. The Role of the RecFOR Complex in Genome Stability.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Crystal Structure of an SSB Protein fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Piero R BiancoCenter for Single Molecule Biophysics, Department of Biochemistry, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA. Electronic address: pbianco@buffalo.edu.

Funding

Mechanistic studies of stalled DNA replication fork rescueR01GM100156 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BIANCO, PIERO R, LYUBCHENKO, YURI L · 2013 to 2021
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The E. coli single stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) is essential to all aspects of DNA metabolism. Here, it has two seemingly disparate but equally important roles: it binds rapidly and cooperatively to single stranded DNA (ssDNA) and it binds to partner proteins that constitute the SSB interactome. These two roles are not disparate but are instead, intimately linked. A model is presented wherein the intrinsically disordered linker (IDL) is directly responsible for mediating protein-protein interactions. It does this by binding, via PXXP motifs, to the OB-fold (aka SH3 domain) of a nearby protein. When the nearby protein is another SSB tetramer, this leads to a highly efficient ssDNA binding reaction that rapidly and cooperatively covers and protects the exposed nucleic acid from degradation. Alternatively, when the nearby protein is a member of the SSB interactome, loading of the enzyme onto the DNA takes places.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Single-StrandedEscherichia coli ProteinsHumansModels, BiologicalDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Single-StrandedEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27838363
PMCPMC5423859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.