Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27838311›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2017

Strain and sex based characterization of behavioral expressions in non-induced compulsive-like mice.

Swarup Mitra, Cristiane P Bastos, Savanna Chesworth, Cheryl Frye, Abel Bult-Ito

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Object recognition tasks in rats: Does sex matter?Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Social Nesting, Animal Welfare, and Disease Monitoring.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Swarup MitraDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Alaska Fairbanks, USA; IDeA Network of Biomedical Excellence (INBRE), University of Alaska Fairbanks, USA.
Cristiane P BastosIDeA Network of Biomedical Excellence (INBRE), University of Alaska Fairbanks, USA; Núcleo de Neurociências, Departamento de Fisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Savanna ChesworthDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Alaska Fairbanks, USA.
Cheryl FryeDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Alaska Fairbanks, USA; IDeA Network of Biomedical Excellence (INBRE), University of Alaska Fairbanks, USA; Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, USA.
Abel Bult-ItoDepartment of Biology & Wildlife, University of Alaska Fairbanks, USA. Electronic address: abultito@alaska.edu.
University of Alaska Fairbanks · USAlbany State University · USUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

The Administrative CoreP20GM103395 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS · PI BRIAN M BARNES · 2012 to 2026
$66.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is currently a lack of understanding how genetic background and sex differences attribute to the heterogeneity of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). An animal model of compulsive-like behaviors has been developed through bidirectional selection of house mice (Mus musculus) for high (big cotton nests; BIG mice) and low levels (small nests; SMALL mice) of nest-building behavior. The BIG male strains have predictive and face validity as a spontaneous animal model of OCD. Here, we evaluated compulsive-, anxiety-, cognitive-, and depression-like behaviors among male and proestrus female replicate strains each of BIG (BIG1, BIG2) and SMALL (SML1, SML2) nest-builders, and randomly-bred Controls (C1, C2). BIG1 and BIG2 males and females had higher nesting scores when compared to SMALL and Control strains. Male BIG1 and BIG2 strains showed more compulsive-like nesting than BIG1 and BIG2 proestrus females, which was not observed among the other strains. Nesting scores were also different between BIG replicate male strains. A similar pattern was observed in the compulsive-like marble burying behavior with BIG strains burying more marbles than SMALL and Control strains. Significant replicate and sex differences were also observed in marble burying among the BIG strains. The open field test revealed replicate effects while the BIG strains showed less anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus maze test compared to the SMALL strains. For novel object recognition only the Control strains showed replicate and sex differences. In the depression-like forced swim test proestrus females demonstrated less depression-like behavior than males. BIG and SMALL nest-building strains had a higher corticosterone stress response than the Control strains. Together these results indicate a strong interplay of genetic background and sex in influencing expression of behaviors in our compulsive-like mouse model. These results are in congruence with the clinical heterogeneity of OCD.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsCorticosteroneDepressionDisease Models, AnimalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEstrous CycleExploratory BehaviorFemaleMaleMaze LearningMiceNesting BehaviorObsessive-Compulsive DisorderSpecies SpecificityCorticosteroneGenetic backgroundNon-induced mouse modelOCDSex effectsStrain effects

Identifiers

PMID27838311
PMCPMC5135651
OpenAlexW2550817070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.