Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27838289›Full record

ReviewBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2016

Biopharmaceuticals from microorganisms: from production to purification.

Angela Faustino Jozala, Danilo Costa Geraldes, Louise Lacalendola Tundisi, Valker de Araújo Feitosa, Carlos Alexandre Breyer, Samuel Leite Cardoso, Priscila Gava Mazzola, Laura de Oliveira-Nascimento, Carlota de Oliveira Rangel-Yagui, Pérola de Oliveira Magalhães and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Yeast Midas' touch: recent advances in the valorisation of methanol by yeasts.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  5. Escherichia coli in the production of biopharmaceuticals.Biotechnology and applied biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. l-Asparaginase Type II fromPharmaceutics · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Angela Faustino JozalaUniversidade de Sorocaba (UNISO), Departamento de Tecnologia e Processo Ambiental, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil.
Danilo Costa GeraldesUniversidade de Campinas (UNICAMP), Instituto de Biologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biociências e Tecnologia de produtos bioativos, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Louise Lacalendola TundisiUniversidade de Campinas (UNICAMP), Instituto de Biologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biociências e Tecnologia de produtos bioativos, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Valker de Araújo FeitosaUniversidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Bioquímica e Tecnologia Farmacêutica, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Carlos Alexandre BreyerUniversidade Estadual de São Paulo (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Campus do Litoral Paulista, SP, Brazil.
Samuel Leite CardosoUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Priscila Gava MazzolaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Laura de Oliveira-NascimentoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Campinas, SP, Brazil; Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Tecidual, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Carlota de Oliveira Rangel-YaguiUniversidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Bioquímica e Tecnologia Farmacêutica, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Pérola de Oliveira MagalhãesUniversidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, Departamento de Farmácia, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Marcos Antonio de OliveiraUniversidade Estadual de São Paulo (UNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Campus do Litoral Paulista, SP, Brazil.
Adalberto PessoaUniversidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Bioquímica e Tecnologia Farmacêutica, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: pessoajr@usp.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of biopharmaceuticals dates from the 19th century and within 5-10 years, up to 50% of all drugs in development will be biopharmaceuticals. In the 1980s, the biopharmaceutical industry experienced a significant growth in the production and approval of recombinant proteins such as interferons (IFN α, β, and γ) and growth hormones. The production of biopharmaceuticals, known as bioprocess, involves a wide range of techniques. In this review, we discuss the technology involved in the bioprocess and describe the available strategies and main advances in microbial fermentation and purification process to obtain biopharmaceuticals.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsBiotechnologyMicrobiological TechniquesPharmaceutical PreparationsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsDrug IndustryFermentationHumansRecombinant ProteinsBiological ProductsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsPharmaceutical PreparationsRecombinant ProteinsBiopharmaceuticalsBiotechnologyDownstream processFermentation processUpstream process

Identifiers

PMID27838289
PMCPMC5156500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.