Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27837958›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen2016

[The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement].

Eric I Benchimol, Liam Smeeth, Astrid Guttmann, Katie Harron, Lars G Hemkens, David Moher, Irene Petersen, Henrik T Sørensen, Erik von Elm, Sinéad M Langan and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. [Meta-analysis of evaluation results of psychiatric-psychosomatic rehabilitation in Austria].Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Eric I BenchimolChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics and School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: ebenchimol@cheo.on.ca.
Liam SmeethLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Astrid GuttmannInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada; Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Paediatrics and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Katie HarronLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Lars G HemkensBasel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.
David MoherOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada, and School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventative Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Irene PetersenDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom.
Henrik T SørensenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Erik von ElmCochrane Switzerland, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University Medical Centre Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sinéad M LanganLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: sinead.langan@lshtm.ac.uk.
RECORD Working Committee

Funding

Department of Health NIHR/CS/010/014Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Routinely collected health data, obtained for administrative and clinical purposes without specific a priori research goals, are increasingly used for research. The rapid evolution and availability of these data have revealed issues not addressed by existing reporting guidelines, such as Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health Data (RECORD) statement was created to fill these gaps. RECORD was created as an extension to the STROBE statement to address reporting items specific to observational studies using routinely collected health data. RECORD consists of a checklist of 13 items related to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion section of articles, and other information required for inclusion in such research reports. This document contains the checklist as well as explanatory and elaboration information to enhance the use of the checklist. Examples of good reporting for each RECORD checklist item are also included. This document, as well as the accompanying website and message board (http://www.record-statement.org), will improve the implementation and understanding of RECORD. By implementing RECORD, authors, journals editors, and peer reviewers can enhance transparency of research reporting.

Indexed as

ChecklistGuidelines as TopicObservational Studies as TopicResearch ReportBiomedical ResearchData CollectionGermanyHumansAdministrative GesundheitsdatenBeobachtungsstudiencase-control studiesClinical Practice Research Datalinkcohort studiesconsensusCPRDDatenbanken zur GrundversorgungdocumentationDokumentationelectronic health dataElektronische Gesundheitsdatenepidemiologic methodsEpidemiologische MethodenFall-Kontroll-StudienGeneral Practice Research DatabaseGesundheitsbezogene RoutinedatenGPRDhealth administrative dataHospital Standardised Mortality RatioHSMRICDinformation disseminationInformationsverbreitungInternational Classification of DiseasesISCknowledge disseminationKohortenstudienKonsensusLeitlinien für ForschungsberichteMDCmedical journalsMedical Subject HeadingMedizinischen ZeitschriftenMeSHmHealth-Appsmobile GesundheitsapplikationenNational Health ServiceNew South Wales Inpatient Statistics CollectionNew South Wales Midwives Data CollectionNHSNon-Small Cell Lung CancerNSCLCobservational researchPaediatric Intensive Care Audit NetworkPETPICANetPositronen-Emissions-TomographiepublishingPublizierenRECORDreporting guidelinesREporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health Dataroutinely collected health datascientific journalsSEERSNIIRAMStrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in EpidemiologySTROBESurveillance, Epidemiology, and End ResultsSystème National d’Informations Inter Régimes de l’Assurance MaladieWissenschaftliche ZeitschriftenWissensverbreitungZeitschriften mit Peer-Review

Identifiers

PMID27837958
PMCPMC5330542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.