Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27837661›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2017

Neuroadhesive L1 coating attenuates acute microglial attachment to neural electrodes as revealed by live two-photon microscopy.

James R Eles, Alberto L Vazquez, Noah R Snyder, Carl Lagenaur, Matthew C Murphy, Takashi D Y Kozai, X Tracy Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chronic alteration of CaBiomaterials · 2026
    Article
  2. Fabrication of High-Density Multimodal Neural Probes Based on Heterogeneously Integrated CMOS.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Chronic alteration of CabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. In vivo microelectrode arrays for neuroscience.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James R ElesBioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, United States.
Alberto L VazquezBioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, United States; Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, United States; Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, United States.
Noah R SnyderBioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, United States.
Carl LagenaurNeurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, United States.
Matthew C MurphyRadiology, University of Pittsburgh, United States.
Takashi D Y KozaiBioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, United States; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, United States; NeuroTech Center of the University of Pittsburgh Brain Institute, United States. Electronic address: tdk18@pitt.edu.
X Tracy CuiBioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, United States; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University, United States; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, United States. Electronic address: xic11@pitt.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USCarnegie Mellon University · USCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition · US

Funding

Improving chronic neural recording performance through biomaterial strategiesR01NS062019 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CUI, XINYAN TRACY · 2008 to 2018
$4.4M
Inhibition of Neural Electrode-mediated Inflammation and Neuronal Cell DeathR01NS089688 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CUI, XINYAN TRACY · 2015 to 2019
$3.1M
Mechanisms behind Electrode Induced BBB damage's impact on neural recordingR01NS094396 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KOZAI, TAKASHI DANIEL YOSHIDA · 2015 to 2019
$2.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS062019NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS089688NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implantable neural electrode technologies for chronic neural recordings can restore functional control to paralysis and limb loss victims through brain-machine interfaces. These probes, however, have high failure rates partly due to the biological responses to the probe which generate an inflammatory scar and subsequent neuronal cell death. L1 is a neuronal specific cell adhesion molecule and has been shown to minimize glial scar formation and promote electrode-neuron integration when covalently attached to the surface of neural probes. In this work, the acute microglial response to L1-coated neural probes was evaluated in vivo by implanting coated devices into the cortex of mice with fluorescently labeled microglia, and tracking microglial dynamics with multi-photon microscopy for the ensuing 6 h in order to understand L1's cellular mechanisms of action. Microglia became activated immediately after implantation, extending processes towards both L1-coated and uncoated control probes at similar velocities. After the processes made contact with the probes, microglial processes expanded to cover 47.7% of the control probes' surfaces. For L1-coated probes, however, there was a statistically significant 83% reduction in microglial surface coverage. This effect was sustained through the experiment. At 6 h post-implant, the radius of microglia activation was reduced for the L1 probes by 20%, shifting from 130.0 to 103.5 μm with the coating. Microglia as far as 270 μm from the implant site displayed significantly lower morphological characteristics of activation for the L1 group. These results suggest that the L1 surface treatment works in an acute setting by microglial mediated mechanisms.

Indexed as

Electrodes, ImplantedAnimalsCell AdhesionCoated Materials, BiocompatibleForeign-Body ReactionImmobilized ProteinsMiceMice, TransgenicMicroelectrodesMicrogliaNeural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1Coated Materials, BiocompatibleImmobilized ProteinsNeural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1Biomimetic coatingsForeign body responseMicroelectrode implantsNeural camouflageProtein immobilizationSurface modification

Identifiers

PMID27837661
PMCPMC5563378
OpenAlexW2546721731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.