Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27837458›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2017

Pancreatic stump closure after pancreatoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a retrospective clinical study.

Claudio Mauriello, Andrea Polistena, Claudio Gambardella, Ernesto Tartaglia, Michele Orditura, Ferdinando De Vita, Luigi Santini, Nicola Avenia, Giovanni Conzo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claudio MaurielloDivision of General and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Anesthesiologic, Surgical and Emergency Sciences, School of Medicine, Second University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Andrea PolistenaMedical School, General Surgery and Surgical Specialties Unit, S. Maria University Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy.
Claudio GambardellaDivision of General and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Anesthesiologic, Surgical and Emergency Sciences, School of Medicine, Second University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Ernesto TartagliaDivision of General and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Anesthesiologic, Surgical and Emergency Sciences, School of Medicine, Second University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Michele OrdituraDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal and Experimental Medicine "F. Magrassi", School of Medicine, Second University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Ferdinando De VitaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal and Experimental Medicine "F. Magrassi", School of Medicine, Second University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Luigi SantiniDivision of General and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Anesthesiologic, Surgical and Emergency Sciences, School of Medicine, Second University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Nicola AveniaMedical School, General Surgery and Surgical Specialties Unit, S. Maria University Hospital, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy.
Giovanni ConzoDivision of General and Oncologic Surgery, Department of Anesthesiologic, Surgical and Emergency Sciences, School of Medicine, Second University of Naples, Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. giovanni.conzo@unina2.it.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic fistula (PF) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) represents the major source of morbidity. Derivative procedures are preferred by pancreatic surgeons, but the optimal management of remnant pancreatic stump remains controversial.

aimsThe purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pancreatic stump closure in selected elderly patients (>65 years).

methodsClinical data of 44 PD undergone mechanical closure of the pancreatic stump performed between 2001 and 2014 in two department of general and oncologic surgery were retrospectively collected. Considering the age, patients were divided into two groups: 21 patients of less than 65 years (Group A) and 23 patients of more than 65 years (Group B).

resultsA soft pancreatic parenchyma with a not-dilated duct (diameter <3 mm) was reported in all the 44 patients. A grade-A PF, which did not required further treatments, developed in 20 cases (45.4%; 13 in group A and 7 in group B; p < 0.05), grade-B in 5 patients (11.4%; 3 in group A and 2 in group B; statistically not significant) and a grade-C PF was observed only in one patient (2.2%; 1 in group A and 0 in group B). DISCUSSION: In selected "high risk" elderly patients (>65 years) with soft pancreatic texture, the closure of the pancreatic stump can be a useful tool in the surgical armamentarium with the aim to reduce the incidence of age-related complications.

conclusionsProspective randomized controlled trial to better evaluate PF risk factors is needed.

Indexed as

PancreasPancreatic FistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyAgedAge FactorsChi-Square DistributionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsElderly patientsPancreatic cancerPancreatic duct occlusionPancreatic fistulaPancreatoduodenectomy

Identifiers

PMID27837458
PMCPMC5334406
OpenAlexW2553340997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.