Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27837296›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2017

Comparison of Local Recurrence After Simple and Skin-Sparing Mastectomy Performed in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Simon Timbrell, Sarah Al-Himdani, Oliver Shaw, Kian Tan, Julie Morris, Nigel Bundred

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Skin-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Current Therapeutic Approaches to DCIS.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simon TimbrellAcademic Surgery, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sarah Al-HimdaniAcademic Surgery, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Oliver ShawAcademic Surgery, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kian TanAcademic Surgery, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Julie MorrisAcademic Surgery, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Nigel BundredAcademic Surgery, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK. nbundred@manchester.ac.uk.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is increasing with the use of screening mammography, and approximately 30% of all women diagnosed with DCIS are treated by mastectomy. There is increasing use of a skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) approach to surgically excise DCIS as this facilitates immediate breast reconstruction. The rates of locoregional recurrence (LRR) after simple mastectomy performed for pure DCIS are historically reported as 1%; however, international data suggest that LRR after SSM may be higher.

methodsTo determine our rates of LRR and compare the effect of the type of mastectomy performed, we undertook a retrospective review of all patients who underwent a mastectomy for pure DCIS at our institution between 2000 and 2010.

resultsIn total, 199 patients underwent a mastectomy for pure DCIS (with eight local recurrences), all of which were invasive ductal carcinoma. The recurrences all occurred after SSM, which was associated with a higher 5-year LRR of 5.9% (5/102) compared with 0% in the simple mastectomy group (0/97; p = 0.012), log-rank. Univariate analysis showed the two factors that predicted the risk of recurrence were a young age at mastectomy and close or involved margins.

conclusionsThese data highlight the importance of achieving clear margins, especially in young women with estrogen receptor-negative DCIS who have a higher risk of invasive recurrence. Women undergoing a mastectomy for DCIS should be counseled as to the importance of achieving clear margins and the potential increased need for further excision, post-mastectomy radiotherapy and post-reconstruction mammography in order to prevent LRR after SSM.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMargins of ExcisionMastectomy, SimpleMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualOrgan Sparing Treatments

Identifiers

PMID27837296
PMCPMC5339328
OpenAlexW2555405020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.