Trial reportLangenbeck's archives of surgery2017
Chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair with the ONSTEP versus the Lichtenstein technique, results of a double-blinded multicenter randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Suture for Mesh Fixation on Pain and Other Complications in Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair: a Double-blind, Randomized Study Comparing the Lichtenstein With the Onstep Technique - the ONLI Trial.
Comparison of Postoperative Inguinal Pain Between the Onstep Technique and the Lichtenstein Technique: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of sexual function following Lichtenstein versus laparoscopic mesh repair in primary inguinal hernias, the meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Watchful waiting vs repair for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernia in men: a systematic review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Trends in the use of patient-reported outcome measures for inguinal hernia repair: a quantitative systematic review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Open new simplified totally extraperitoneal (ONSTEP) versus Lichtenstein repair for primary inguinal hernias.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2021Trial
- Postoperative inguinal pain and disability after Lichtenstein versus ONSTEP hernia repair: analysis of responses to the inguinal pain questionnaire in Spanish.Surgery today · 2021Trial
- Magnetic resonance visualization of iron-loaded meshes in patients with pain after inguinal hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021Article
- A registry-based 2-year follow-up comparative study of two meshes used in transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) groin hernia repair.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Article
- Chronic pain after two laparoendoscopic inguinal hernia repairs compared with laparoendoscopic repair followed by the Lichtenstein repair: an international questionnaire study.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Decreasing prevalence of chronic pain after laparoscopic groin hernia repair: a nationwide cross-sectional questionnaire study.Surgery today · 2018Article
- Management of chronic pain after hernia repair.Journal of pain research · 2018Review
- Reply to comment to: Recurrence mechanisms after inguinal hernia repair by the Onstep technique: a case series.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe open new simplified totally extraperitoneal (ONSTEP) technique for the repair of inguinal hernia was presented some years ago with promising initial results regarding chronic pain. We conducted a randomized clinical trial investigating the ONSTEP technique versus the Lichtenstein technique with focus on postoperative pain. The aim of this paper was to report the results regarding chronic pain from follow-up at 6 and 12 months for the participants in the ONSTEP versus Lichtenstein trial.
methodsThis study was conducted as a randomized double-blinded clinical trial in male participants with primary unilateral hernias, having surgical repair of their hernia at one of five participating general surgical departments. At surgery, participants were allocated (1:1) to the ONSTEP or the Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair. Participants were followed up with questionnaires at 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with substantial pain-related impairment of daily functions at 6- and 12-month follow-ups.
resultsFrom April 2013 to May 2014, 290 male patients were included in the study. Regarding follow-up for pain, a total of 259 patients (89%) completed the 6-month follow-up and a total of 236 patients (81%) completed the 12-month follow-up. Regarding pain at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, no difference was found between groups. Two patients operated with Lichtenstein technique developed severe disabling chronic pain postoperatively, which was not seen in the ONSTEP group.
conclusionThe ONSTEP technique was not superior to the Lichtenstein technique regarding chronic pain following repair of primary inguinal hernias in males.
trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov NCT01753219.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.