ArticleInternational journal of public health2017
Quantitative risk assessment of human salmonellosis in the smallholder pig value chains in urban of Vietnam.
Article in International journal of public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04594122 (Safe Food, Fair Food For Cambodia), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Safe Food, Fair Food For Cambodia
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perceived risk factors and their influence on compliance with meat safety guidelines among butchers and fresh meat retailers in Ghana.Dialogues in health · 2025Article
- A review and meta-analysis of non-typhoidalOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Review
- Non-typhoidalFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- How can climate change and its interaction with other compounding risks be considered in evaluation? Experiences from Vietnam.Evaluation (London, England : 1995) · 2023Article
- Article
- Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Challenges and Opportunities towards the Development of Risk Assessment at the Consumer Phase in Developing Countries-The Case ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Understanding Antibiotic Residues and Pathogens Flow in Wastewater from Smallholder Pig Farms to Agriculture Field in Ha Nam Province, Vietnam.Environmental health insights · 2020Article
- Simulating Cross-Contamination of Cooked Pork withInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Health and social determinants of health in Vietnam: local evidence and international implications.International journal of public health · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo quantify salmonellosis risk in humans through consumption of boiled pork in urban Hung Yen Province, Vietnam, using a quantitative microbial risk assessment.
methodsWe collected 302 samples along the pork value chain in Hung Yen between April 2014 and February 2015. We developed a model in @Risk, based on microbiological, market, and household surveys on cooking, cross-contamination and consumption, and conducted sensitivity analysis.
resultsSalmonella prevalence of pen floor swabs, slaughterhouse carcasses and cut pork were 33.3, 41.7 and 44.4%, respectively. The annual incidence rate of salmonellosis in humans was estimated to be 17.7% (90% CI 0.89-45.96). Parameters with the greatest influence risk were household pork handling practice followed by prevalence in pork sold in the central market. Wide confidence interval in the incidence estimate was mainly due to the variability in the degree of reduction in bacteria concentration by cooking, and pork consumption pattern.
conclusionsThe risk of salmonellosis in humans due to boiled pork consumption appears to be high. Control measures may include improving the safety of retailed pork and improving household hygiene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.