Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27837219›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2018

ACL substitution may improve kinematics of PCL-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Thomas Zumbrunn, Michael P Duffy, Harry E Rubash, Henrik Malchau, Orhun K Muratoglu, Kartik Mangudi Varadarajan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Biomechanics and Outcomes of Modern Tibial Polyethylene Inserts.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Thomas ZumbrunnDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Technology Implementation Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, GRJ-1223, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Michael P DuffyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Technology Implementation Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, GRJ-1223, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Harry E RubashDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Technology Implementation Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, GRJ-1223, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Henrik MalchauDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Technology Implementation Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, GRJ-1223, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Orhun K MuratogluDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Technology Implementation Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, GRJ-1223, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Kartik Mangudi VaradarajanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Technology Implementation Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, GRJ-1223, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. kmangudivaradarajan@mgh.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOne of the key factors responsible for altered kinematics and joint stability following contemporary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is resection of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). However, ACL retention can present several technical challenges, and in some cases may not be viable due to an absent or nonfunctional ACL. Therefore, the goal of this research was to investigate whether substitution of the ACL through an anterior post mechanism could improve kinematic deficits of contemporary posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retaining implants.

methodsKinematic analysis of different implant types was done using KneeSIM, a previously established dynamic simulation tool. Walking, stair-ascent, chair-sit, and deep knee bend were simulated for an ACL-substituting (PCL-retaining) design, a bi-cruciate-retaining and ACL-sacrificing (PCL-retaining) implant, as well as the native knee. The motion of the femoral condyles relative to the tibia was recorded for kinematic comparisons.

resultsThe ACL-substituting and ACL-retaining implants provided similar kinematic improvements over the ACL-sacrificing implant, by reducing posterior femoral shift in extension and preventing paradoxical anterior sliding. During all simulated activities, the ACL-sacrificing implant showed between 7 and 8 mm of posterior shift in extension in contrast to the ACL-retaining implant and the ACL-substituting design, which showed overall kinematic trends similar to the native knee.

conclusionThe absence of ACL function has been linked to abnormal kinematics and joint stability in patients with contemporary TKA. ACL-substituting implants could be a valuable treatment option capable of overcoming the limitations of contemporary TKA, particularly when retaining the native ACL is not feasible or is challenging.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate LigamentArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationHumansJoint InstabilityKnee JointModels, AnatomicPosterior Cruciate LigamentPostoperative ComplicationsRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment OutcomeACL substitutionDynamic simulationKinematicsTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID27837219
OpenAlexW2549687913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.