ReviewHNO2016
[Preclinical models in head and neck tumors : Evaluation of cellular and molecular resistance mechanisms in the tumor microenvironment].
Review in HNO, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Irradiation‑induced cellular senescence is linked to pro‑survival signaling and checkpoint regulation in a 2D and 3D model for head and neck cancer.Oncology reports · 2025Article
- The Role of Tumor Microenvironment in Chemoresistance: To Survive, Keep Your Enemies Closer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) are characterized by a distinct intertumorigenic and intratumorigenic heterogeneity, they often show substantial differences in the response to established therapy strategies. At present, a multitude of biologics and new pharmacological compounds for targeted therapies are available that allow more efficient and less toxic treatment. There is increasing pressure to establish predictive assays not only for ex ante analysis of the individual patient response to combined chemoradiotherapy and targeted therapies but also for investigation of the efficacy of new drugs. In this respect it is essential to maintain the pathophysiological tissue composition as it is known that paracrine tumor-stroma cell interactions may influence tumor reactivity to treatment. More complex models for individualized sensitivity testing have recently been described and the results are promising to pave the way for personalized cancer therapy. This review article focuses on different systems for maintaining the tumor microenvironment and hence the individual cellular composition, such as 3D organotypic models, organotypic multicellular spheroids, patient-derived xenografts and ex vivo tissue cultures and discusses the advantages and disadvantages in terms of translation into clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27837212What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.