ReviewHNO2017
[Modern imaging of the temporal bone].
Review in HNO, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Rare Disorders of the Vestibular Labyrinth: of Zebras, Chameleons and Wolves in Sheep's Clothing.Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2021Review
- Article
- Review and update of temporal bone imaging.Radiologia brasileiraArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article describes the current significance of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cone beam CT, digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and special X‑rays in the diagnostics of temporal bone diseases. The latter is obsolete for diagnostic intentions. Possibilities and limitations in terms of detection and/or depiction of the extent of inflammatory, traumatic, tumorous, and postoperative pathologies are discussed. A concrete question and conveyance of clinical findings influence the choice of the method to be applied in the individual case. Malformations of the middle ear can only be detected noninvasively by CT or cone beam CT. These are also the methods that may support the diagnosis of otosclerosis in clinically unclear cases. MRI is the method of choice for pathologies of the inner ear and internal auditory canal, including inner ear malformations. At present, only in few institutions is a successful visualization of endolymphatic hydrops in Menière's disease realized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.