ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2017
Partial reconstitution of the RNAi response in human cells using Drosophila gene products.
Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Untangling the roles of RNA helicases in antiviral innate immunity.PLoS pathogens · 2021Review
- Flavivirus induces and antagonizes antiviral RNA interference in both mammals and mosquitoes.Science advances · 2020Article
- Key Mechanistic Principles and Considerations Concerning RNA Interference.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Review
- Nutrigenomics as a tool to study the impact of diet on aging and age-related diseases: theGenes & nutrition · 2019Review
- Small RNA-based antimicrobial immunity.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
While mammalian somatic cells are incapable of mounting an effective RNA interference (RNAi) response to viral infections, plants and invertebrates are able to generate high levels of viral short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that can control many infections. In Drosophila, the RNAi response is mediated by the Dicer 2 enzyme (dDcr2) acting in concert with two cofactors called Loqs-PD and R2D2. To examine whether a functional RNAi response could be mounted in human somatic cells, we expressed dDcr2, in the presence or absence of Loqs-PD and/or R2D2, in a previously described human cell line, NoDice/ΔPKR, that lacks functional forms of human Dicer (hDcr) and PKR. We observed significant production of ∼21-nt long siRNAs, derived from a cotransfected double stranded RNA (dsRNA) expression vector, that were loaded into the human RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) and were able to significantly reduce the expression of a cognate indicator gene. Surprisingly, dDcr2 was able to produce siRNAs even in the absence of Loqs-PD, which is thought to be required for dsRNA cleavage by dDcr2. This result may be explained by our finding that dDcr2 is able to bind the human Loqs-PD homolog TRBP when expressed in human cells in the absence of Loqs-PD. We conclude that it is possible to at least partially rescue the ability of mammalian somatic cells to express functional siRNAs using gene products of invertebrate origin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.