Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27836506›Full record

Observational studyContemporary clinical trials2017

Evaluating community health centers' adoption of a new global capitation payment (eCHANGE) study protocol.

H Angier, J P O'Malley, M Marino, K J McConnell, E Cottrell, R L Jacob, S Likumahuwa-Ackman, J Heintzman, N Huguet, S R Bailey and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Contemporary clinical trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02637869 (Evaluating Community Health Centers' Adoption of a New Global Capitation Payment), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02637869 unknown statusnot on this map

Evaluating Community Health Centers' Adoption of a New Global Capitation Payment

TypeobservationalSponsorOregon Health and Science UniversityRan2015 to 2020Enrolled400,000ConditionsChronic DiseasesArmsAlternative Payment Model
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

H AngierOregon Health & Science University, United States. Electronic address: angierh@ohsu.edu.
J P O'MalleyOregon Health & Science University, United States.
M MarinoOregon Health & Science University, United States.
K J McConnellOregon Health & Science University, United States.
E CottrellOregon Health & Science University, United States; OCHIN, Inc., United States.
R L JacobOCHIN, Inc., United States.
S Likumahuwa-AckmanOregon Health & Science University, United States.
J HeintzmanOregon Health & Science University, United States.
N HuguetOregon Health & Science University, United States.
S R BaileyOregon Health & Science University, United States.
J E DeVoeOregon Health & Science University, United States; OCHIN, Inc., United States.

Funding

Evaluating Community Health Centers' Adoption of a New Global Capitation PaymentR01HS022651 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HEINTZMAN, JOHN · 2015 to 2018
$1000k
Meaningful Use and Treatment of Smoking in Federally-Qualified Health CentersK23DA037453 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BAILEY, STEFFANI R · 2015 to 2019
$841k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS022651NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA037453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary care patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) are an effective healthcare delivery model. Evidence regarding the most effective payment models for increased coordination efforts is sparse. This protocol paper describes the evaluation of an Alternative Payment Methodology (APM) implemented in a subset of Oregon community health centers (CHCs), using a prospective matched observational design. The APM is a primary care payment reform intervention that changed Oregon's Medicaid payment for several CHCs from fee-for-service reimbursement to a per-member-per-month capitated payment. We will implement a difference-in-difference analytic approach to evaluate pre-post APM changes between intervention and control groups, including: 1) clinic-level outcomes, 2) patient-level clinical outcomes, and 3) patient-level econometric outcomes. Findings from the project will be of national significance, as there is a need for evidence regarding how novel payment methods might enhance PCMH capabilities and support their capacity to produce better quality and outcomes. If this capitated payment method is proven effective, study findings will inform dissemination of similar APMs nationwide.

Indexed as

Capitation FeeCommunity Health CentersFee-for-Service PlansHumansMedicaidOregonPatient-Centered CarePrimary Health CareProspective StudiesReimbursement MechanismsUnited StatesCapitationMedicaidPatient-centered medical homesPayment methodology

Identifiers

PMID27836506
PMCPMC5267970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.