Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27836423›Full record

ReviewSeminars in perinatology2017

Impact of probiotics on necrotizing enterocolitis.

Mark A Underwood

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in perinatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Nutrients · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark A UnderwoodDivision of Neonatology, UC Davis School of Medicine, Ticon 2, 2516 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95817. Electronic address: munderwood@ucdavis.edu.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Necrotizing Enterocolitis: Prevention and PredictionR01HD059127 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LEBRILLA, CARLITO B, MILLS, DAVID ANDREW · 2008 to 2012
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large number of randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials and cohort studies have demonstrated a decrease in the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis with administration of probiotic microbes. These studies have prompted many neonatologists to adopt routine prophylactic administration of probiotics while others await more definitive studies and/or probiotic products with demonstrated purity and stable numbers of live organisms. Cross-contamination and inadequate sample size limit the value of further traditional placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials. Key areas for future research include mechanisms of protection, optimum probiotic species or strains (or combinations thereof) and duration of treatment, interactions between diet and the administered probiotic, and the influence of genetic polymorphisms in the mother and infant on probiotic response. Next generation probiotics selected based on bacterial genetics rather than ease of production and large cluster-randomized clinical trials hold great promise for NEC prevention.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeEnterocolitis, NecrotizingHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaInfant, Very Low Birth WeightInfusions, ParenteralIntestinal MucosaProbioticsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBifidobacteriumHuman milk oligosaccharideLactobacillusNecrotizing enterocolitisPrebioticPremature infantProbiotic

Identifiers

PMID27836423
PMCPMC5334136
OpenAlexW2553969814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.