Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27836262›Full record

ArticleIntensive & critical care nursing2017

Tissue interface pressure and skin integrity in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients.

Mary Jo Grap, Cindy L Munro, Paul A Wetzel, Christine M Schubert, Anathea Pepperl, Ruth S Burk, Valentina Lucas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive & critical care nursing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mary Jo GrapAdult Health and Nursing Systems Department of the School of Nursing, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States. Electronic address: mjgrap@vcu.edu.
Cindy L MunroCollege of Nursing, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States.
Paul A WetzelBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Christine M SchubertDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH, United States.
Anathea PepperlBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Ruth S BurkAdult Health and Nursing Systems Department of the School of Nursing, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
Valentina LucasDepartment of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Heath System, Richmond, VA, United States.

Funding

Effect of Backrest Elevation on Skin Integrity in the Critically IllR01NR010381 · NINR · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI GRAP, MARY JO · 2009 to 2011
$1.4M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR010381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe tissue interface pressure, time spent above critical pressure levels and the effect on skin integrity at seven anatomical locations. DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS: Descriptive, longitudinal study in critically ill mechanically ventilated adults, from Surgical Trauma ICU-STICU; Medical Respiratory ICU-MRICU; Neuroscience ICU-NSICU in a Mid-Atlantic urban university medical centre. Subjects were enroled in the study within 24hours of intubation. MEASUREMENTS: Tissue interface pressure was measured continuously using the XSENSOR pressure mapping system (XSENSOR Technology Corporation, Calgary, Canada). Skin integrity was observed at all sites, twice daily, using the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel staging system, for the first seven ICU days and at day 10 and 14.

resultsOf the 132 subjects, 90.9% had no observed changes in skin integrity. Maximum interface pressure was above 32mmHg virtually 100% of the time for the sacrum, left and right trochanter. At the 45mmHg level, the left and right trochanter had the greatest amount of time above this level (greater than 95% of the time), followed by the sacrum, left and right scapula, and the left and right heels. Similarly, at levels above 60mmHg, the same site order applied. For those six subjects with sacral skin integrity changes, maximum pressures were greater than 32mmHg 100% of the time. Four of the six sacral changes were associated with greater amounts of time above both 45mmHg and 60mmHg than the entire sample.

conclusionsMaximum tissue interface pressure was above critical levels for the majority of the documented periods, especially in the sacrum, although few changes in skin integrity were documented. Time spent above critical levels for mean pressures were considerably less compared to maximum pressures. Maximum pressures may have reflected pressure spikes, but the large amount of time above the critical pressure levels remains substantial.

Indexed as

AdultBody Surface Potential MappingCanadaCritical IllnessFemaleFemurHeelHumansIntensive Care UnitsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPressurePressure UlcerRespiration, ArtificialSacrumCritical careMechanical ventilationPressure ulcersTissue interface pressure

Identifiers

PMID27836262
PMCPMC5641974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.