Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27835973›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Practical lessons for bringing policy-makers on board in sexual and reproductive health research.

Aurore Guieu, Wei-Hong Zhang, Yves Lafort, Peter Decat, Sara De Meyer, Shuchen Wang, Birgit Kerstens, Els Duysburgh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aurore GuieuInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, UZP114, Ghent, 9000, Belgium. aguieu@gmail.com.
Wei-Hong ZhangInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, UZP114, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Yves LafortInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, UZP114, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Peter DecatInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, UZP114, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Sara De MeyerInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, UZP114, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Shuchen WangInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, UZP114, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Birgit KerstensInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, UZP114, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Els DuysburghInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, UZP114, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe need to translate research into policy, i.e. making research findings a driving force in agenda-setting and policy change, is increasingly acknowledged. However, little is known about translation mechanisms in the field of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outside North American or European contexts. This paper seeks to give an overview of the existing knowledge on this topic as well as to document practical challenges and remedies from the perspectives of researchers involved in four SRH research consortium projects in Latin America, sub-Saharan Africa, China and India.

methodsA literature review and relevant project documents were used to develop an interview guide through which researchers could reflect on their experiences in engaging with policy-makers, and particularly on the obstacles met and the strategies deployed by the four project consortia to circumvent them.

resultsOur findings confirm current recommendations on an early and steady involvement of policy-makers, however they also suggest that local barriers between researchers and policy-making spheres and individuals can represent major hindrances to the realization of translation objectives. Although many of the challenges might be common to different contexts, creating locally-adapted responses is deemed key to overcome them. Researchers' experiences also indicate that - although inevitable - recognizing and addressing these challenges is a difficult, time- and energy-consuming process for all partners involved. Despite a lack of existing knowledge on translation efforts in SRH research outside North American or European contexts, and more particularly in low and middle-income countries, it is clear that existing pressure on health and policy systems in these settings further complicates them.

conclusionsThis article brings together literature findings and researchers' own experiences in translating research results into policy and highlights the major challenges research conducted on sexual and reproductive health outside North American or European contexts can meet. Future SRH projects should be particularly attentive to these potential obstacles in order to tailor appropriate and consistent strategies within their existing resources.

Indexed as

Policy MakingReproductive HealthAdministrative PersonnelAfrica South of the SaharaChinaHealth PolicyHumansIndiaLatin AmericaReproductive Health ServicesResearchResearch PersonnelSexual BehaviorChinaIndiaLatin AmericaPolicyPolicy-makersResearch TranslationSexual and Reproductive HealthStakeholdersSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID27835973
PMCPMC5106764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.