Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27835963›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2016

Flip-flop footwear with a moulded foot-bed for the treatment of foot pain: a randomised controlled trial.

Vivienne Helaine Chuter, Angela Searle, Martin J Spink

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04894383 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Study Into the Use of Prefabricated Orthotics in Shoes, in Combination With Using Indoor Comfort Sandals With built-in Arch Support vs. the Sole Use of Prefabricated Orthotics in Shoes Alone, for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis. A Randomised Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTalita Cumi Ltd.Ran2021 to 2023Enrolled104ConditionsPlantar FascitisArmsAetrex L420 Compete Orthotic, Aetrex indoor comfort sandal with built-in arch support
NCT07000838 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Corrective Rubber Insoles in a Population of Healthcare Professionals With Foot Overpronation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MilanRan2025 to 2026Enrolled52ConditionsHyperpronation, Overpronation, Pes PlanusArmsMedially wedged ortheses
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vivienne Helaine ChuterSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, 10 Chittaway Road, PO Box 127, Ourimbah, NSW, 2258, Australia.
Angela SearleSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, 10 Chittaway Road, PO Box 127, Ourimbah, NSW, 2258, Australia. angela.searle@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4830-288X
Martin J SpinkSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, 10 Chittaway Road, PO Box 127, Ourimbah, NSW, 2258, Australia.
Hunter Water · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFoot pain is a common problem affecting up to 1 in 5 adults and is known to adversely affect activities of daily living and health related quality of life. Orthopaedic footwear interventions are used as a conservative treatment for foot pain, although adherence is known to be low, in part due to the perception of poor comfort and unattractiveness of the footwear. The objective of this trial was to assess the efficacy of flip-flop style footwear (Foot Bio-Tec©) with a moulded foot-bed in reducing foot pain compared to participant's usual footwear.

methodsTwo-arm parallel randomised controlled trial using computer generated random allocation schedule at an Australian university podiatry clinic. 108 volunteers with disabling foot pain were enrolled after responding to an advertisement and eligibility screening. Participants were randomly allocated to receive footwear education and moulded flip-flop footwear to wear as much as they were comfortable with for the next 12 weeks (n = 54) or footwear education and instructions to wear their normal footwear for the next 12 weeks (n = 54). Primary outcome was the pain domain of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ). Secondary outcomes were the foot function and general foot health domains of the FHSQ, a visual analogue scale (VAS) for foot pain and perceived comfort of the intervention footwear.

resultsCompared to the control group, the moulded flip-flop group showed a significant improvement in the primary outcome measure of the FHSQ pain domain (adjusted mean difference 8.36 points, 95 % CI 5.58 to 13.27, p < 0.01). Statistical and clinically significant differences were observed for the secondary measure of foot pain assessed by a VAS and the FSHQ domains of foot function and general foot health. None of the participants reported any pain or discomfort from the intervention footwear and six (footwear group = 4) were lost to follow up.

conclusionsOur results demonstrate that flip-flop footwear with a moulded foot-bed can have a significant effect on foot pain, function and foot health and might be a valuable adjunct therapy for people with foot pain.

trial registrationACTRN12614000933651 . Retrospectively registered: 01/09/2014.

Indexed as

Foot OrthosesAdultAgedFemaleFoot DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal PainTreatment OutcomeHealth status indicatorsPain measurementShoes

Identifiers

PMID27835963
PMCPMC5106832
OpenAlexW2554073403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.