Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27835673›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Comparison of Two Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Programs: A Follow-Up Study among Primary versus Specialized Health Care.

Remedios López-Liria, Francisco Antonio Vega-Ramírez, Patricia Rocamora-Pérez, José Manuel Aguilar-Parra, David Padilla-Góngora

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Home-Based Gait Interventions for Adults with Stroke: A Scoping Review.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Nursing/Physiotherapy Program in Chronic Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Remedios López-LiriaDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almería. Almería. Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3416-2791
Francisco Antonio Vega-RamírezComplejo Hospitalario Torrecárdenas. Servicio Andaluz de Salud. Almería. Spain.
Patricia Rocamora-PérezDepartment of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine, University of Almería. Almería. Spain.
José Manuel Aguilar-ParraDepartment of Psychology, University of Almería. Almería. Spain.
David Padilla-GóngoraDepartment of Psychology, University of Almería. Almería. Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare home-based rehabilitation (RITH) and standard outpatient rehabilitation in a hospital setting, in terms of improving the functional recovery and quality of life of stroke patients. STUDY DESIGN AND

settingThis was a prospective cohort study in Andalusia (Spain).

participantsOne hundred and forty-five patients completed the outcome data. MEASURES: Daily activities were measured by the Barthel index, Canadian Neurological Scale (to assess mental state), Tinetti scale (balance and gait), and Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36 to compare the quality of life).

resultsNo statistically significant differences were found between the two groups regarding the clinical characteristics of patients in the initial measurement, except for age and mental state (younger and with greater neurological impairment in the hospital group). After physical therapy, both groups showed statistically significant improvements from baseline in each of the measures. These improvements were better in RITH patients than in the hospital patients on all functionality scales with a smaller number of sessions.

conclusionsHome rehabilitation is at least as effective as the outpatient rehabilitation programs in a hospital setting, in terms of recovery of functionality in post-stroke patients. Overall quality of life is severely impaired in both groups, as stroke is a very disabling disease that radically affects patients' lives.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareDelivery of Health CareFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHome Care ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePhysical Therapy ModalitiesPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID27835673
PMCPMC5106026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.