Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27835666›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

MR Imaging Analysis of Non-Measurable Enhancing Lesions Newly Appearing after Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy in Glioblastoma Patients for Prognosis Prediction.

Bo Ram Kim, Seung Hong Choi, Tae Jin Yun, Soon-Tae Lee, Chul-Kee Park, Tae Min Kim, Ji-Hoon Kim, Sun-Won Park, Chul-Ho Sohn, Sung-Hye Park and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bo Ram KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung Hong ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5968-3884
Tae Jin YunDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soon-Tae LeeDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chul-Kee ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tae Min KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Hoon KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sun-Won ParkDepartment of Radiology, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chul-Ho SohnDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Hye ParkDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Il Han KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze the enhancement patterns and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of non-measurable surgical cavity wall enhancement pattern, newly appearing after completion of standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with temozolomide in glioblastoma patients for the prognosis prediction. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom January 2010 to April 2014, among 190 patients with histopathologically confirmed glioblastoma, a total of 33 patients with non-measurable wall enhancement on post-CCRT MR imaging were enrolled and divided into two subgroups: non-progression (n = 18) and progression groups (n = 15). We analyzed the wall enhancement patterns, which were categorized into three patterns: thin, thick and nodular enhancement. ADC values were measured in the enhancing portions of the walls. The progression-free survival (PFS) related to the wall enhancement was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test.

resultsStatistically significant differences in the surgical cavity wall enhancement patterns was shown between the progression and non-progression groups (P = 0.0032). Thin wall enhancement was more frequently observed in the non-progression group, and thick or nodular wall enhancement were observed in the progression group (P = 0.0016). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean ADC values between the progression and non-progression groups. The mean PFS was longer in patients with thin wall enhancement than in those with nodular or thick wall enhancement (35.5 months vs. 15.8 months, P = 0.008).

conclusionPattern analysis of non-measurable surgical cavity wall enhancement on post-CCRT MR imaging might be useful tool for predicting prognosis of GBM patient before clear progression of non-measurable disease.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBrain NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyDacarbazineDisease ProgressionFemaleGlioblastomaHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrognosisAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDacarbazineTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID27835666
PMCPMC5105956
OpenAlexW2554133913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.