ArticlePLoS computational biology2016
A Statistical Framework to Identify Deviation from Time Linearity in Epigenetic Aging.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Embracing non-linearity in human ageing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- The Evolving Landscape of Clinical Aging Clocks: From Epigenetic to Multi-Omics Integration.Aging cell · 2026Review
- Privacy-preserving biological age prediction over federated human methylation data using fully homomorphic encryption.Genome research · 2024Article
- Identifying epigenetic aging moderators using the epigenetic pacemaker.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Hibernation slows epigenetic ageing in yellow-bellied marmots.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- Epigenetic age prediction.Aging cell · 2021 · on this mapReview
- Estimage: a webserver hub for the computation of methylation age.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Disentangling age-dependent DNA methylation: deterministic, stochastic, and nonlinear.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Inference of mutability landscapes of tumors from single cell sequencing data.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- The Epigenetic Pacemaker: modeling epigenetic states under an evolutionary framework.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Epigenetic pacemaker: closed form algebraic solutions.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Article
- Aging in a Relativistic Biological Space-Time.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2018Article
- The epigenetic landscape of age-related diseases: the geroscience perspective.Biogerontology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In multiple studies DNA methylation has proven to be an accurate biomarker of age. To develop these biomarkers, the methylation of multiple CpG sites is typically linearly combined to predict chronological age. By contrast, in this study we apply the Universal PaceMaker (UPM) model to investigate changes in DNA methylation during aging. The UPM was initially developed to study rate acceleration/deceleration in sequence evolution. Rather than identifying which linear combinations of sites predicts age, the UPM models the rates of change of multiple CpG sites, as well as their starting methylation levels, and estimates the age of each individual to optimize the model fit. We refer to the estimated age as the "epigenetic age", which is in contrast to the known chronological age of each individual. We construct a statistical framework and devise an algorithm to determine whether a genomic pacemaker is in effect (i.e rates of change vary with age). The decision is made by comparing two competing likelihood based models, the molecular clock (MC) and UPM. For the molecular clock model, we use the known chronological age of each individual and fit the methylation rates at multiple sites, and express the problem as a linear least squares and solve it in polynomial time. For the UPM case, the search space is larger as we are fitting both the epigenetic age of each individual as well as the rates for each site, yet we succeed to reduce the problem to the space of individuals and polynomial in the more significant space-the methylated sites. We first tested our algorithm on simulated data to elucidate the factors affecting the identification of the pacemaker model. We find that, provided with enough data, our algorithm is capable of identifying a pacemaker even when a weak signal is present in the data. Based on these results, we applied our method to DNA methylation data from human blood from individuals of various ages. Although the improvement in variance across sites between the UPM and MC was small, the results suggest that the existence of a pacemaker is highly significant. The PaceMaker results also suggest a decay in the rate of change in DNA methylation with age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.