Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27834841›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2016

"He Doesn't Listen to My Words at All, So I Don't Tell Him Anything"-A Qualitative Investigation on Exposure to Second Hand Smoke among Pregnant Women, Their Husbands and Family Members from Rural Bangladesh and Urban India.

Cath Jackson, Rumana Huque, Veena Satyanarayana, Shammi Nasreen, Manpreet Kaur, Deepa Barua, Prashanta Nath Bhowmik, Mithila Guha, Mukesh Dherani, Atif Rahman and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Prevalence, Sources, and Correlates of Second-hand Smoke Exposure Among Non-smoking Pregnant Women in India.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exposure of second hand smoke in women and children: A narrative review.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Cath JacksonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. cath@validresearch.co.uk.
Rumana HuqueARK Foundation, House 130, Road 21, New DOHS, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1206, Bangladesh. rumanah14@yahoo.com.
Veena SatyanarayanaNational Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore 560029, India. veena.a.s@gmail.com.
Shammi NasreenARK Foundation, House 130, Road 21, New DOHS, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1206, Bangladesh. shammibadrul@yahoo.com.
Manpreet KaurNational Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore 560029, India. mksnimhans@gmail.com.
Deepa BaruaARK Foundation, House 130, Road 21, New DOHS, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1206, Bangladesh. deepa31oct@gmail.com.
Prashanta Nath BhowmikARK Foundation, House 130, Road 21, New DOHS, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1206, Bangladesh. parthonsu@gmail.com.
Mithila GuhaARK Foundation, House 130, Road 21, New DOHS, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1206, Bangladesh. mithilaguha@gmail.com.
Mukesh DheraniInstitute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GL, UK. M.K.Dherani@liverpool.ac.uk.
Atif RahmanInstitute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GL, UK. Atif.Rahman@liverpool.ac.uk.
Kamran SiddiqiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK. kamran.siddiqi@york.ac.uk.
Prabha S ChandraNational Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore 560029, India. chandra@nimhans.ac.in.
ARK Foundation · BDNational Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences · INUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N006224/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Second hand smoke (SHS) exposure during pregnancy is associated with poor pregnancy and fetal outcomes. To design interventions to reduce exposure, an in depth understanding of social and cultural factors of smoking behavior at home is important, especially in South Asia where SHS exposure is high. This study aimed to explore pregnant women's, their husbands' and other family members' knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding home SHS exposure. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 participants in Comilla, Bangladesh and 31 in Bangalore, India (36 pregnant women, 18 husbands, and 10 family members). Data were analyzed using the Framework approach. Husbands smoked in various living areas inside the home, often in the presence of their pregnant wives. Most had never tried to stop smoking at home. Knowledge of the risks was generally poor. Most women had repeatedly asked their husband to smoke outside with little success and only few family members had reprimanded the husbands. Husbands who had stopped did so because of requests from children and their mother. Potential strategies to decrease SHS exposure at home were educating the husband about risks and supporting the pregnant women in negotiation. Interventions must also enlist family support to enhance the woman's self-efficacy.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureBangladeshFemaleHumansIndiaMalePregnancyPregnant PeopleRural PopulationSpousesTobacco Smoke PollutionUrban PopulationTobacco Smoke Pollutionfetuslow and middle income countriesmiddle incomepregnancysecond hand smokesmoke free homessmokingtobaccowomen

Identifiers

PMID27834841
PMCPMC5129308
OpenAlexW2555410125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.