Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27834740›Full record

ReviewThe Biochemical journal2016

Being right on Q: shaping eukaryotic evolution.

Dave Speijer

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Biochemical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. GlialProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Complex II ambiguities-FADHThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Root Extracts of Two Cultivars ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Getting the Message? Native Reactive Electrophiles Pass Two Out of Three Thresholds to be Bona Fide Signaling Mediators.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2018
    Review
  18. Response to Ghiselli FPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dave SpeijerMedical Biochemistry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation by mitochondria is an incompletely understood eukaryotic process. I proposed a kinetic model [BioEssays (2011) 33: , 88-94] in which the ratio between electrons entering the respiratory chain via FADH

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionElectron Transport Complex IEukaryotaMitochondriaPeroxisomesReactive Oxygen SpeciesElectron Transport Complex IReactive Oxygen SpeciesFADH2/NADH ratiomitochondriaperoxisomesreactive oxygen speciesreverse electron transportuncoupling

Identifiers

PMID27834740
PMCPMC5103874
OpenAlexW2552979165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.