Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27834063›Full record

ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2017

Clinical Utility of Measurement of Vitamin D-Binding Protein and Calculation of Bioavailable Vitamin D in Assessment of Vitamin D Status.

Hyun Jeong Kim, Misuk Ji, Junghan Song, Hee Won Moon, Mina Hur, Yeo Min Yun

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Evaluation of Vitamin D Fractions in Obese Hypertensive Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Clinical Usefulness of Bioavailable Vitamin D and Impact ofInternational journal of endocrinology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hyun Jeong KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Korean Association of Health Promotion, Seoul, Korea.
Misuk JiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Junghan SongDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Hee Won MoonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine and Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Mina HurDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine and Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Yeo Min YunDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine and Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. ymyun@kuh.ac.kr.
Konkuk University Medical Center · KRKorea Association of Health Promotion · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRVeterans Health Service Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe associations of vitamin D deficiency with various clinical conditions highlighted the importance of vitamin D testing. Currently, clinicians measure only the total 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration, regardless of its bioavailability. We aimed to determine the effect of vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP) on 25(OH)D bioavailability.

methodsSerum samples were collected from 60 healthy controls, 50 pregnant women, and 50 patients in intensive care units (ICUs). Total 25(OH)D was quantified by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and VDBP levels were determined by using an ELISA kit (R&D Systems, USA). The bioavailable 25(OH)D levels were calculated by using total 25(OH)D, VDBP, and albumin concentrations.

resultsIn comparison with healthy controls, the total 25(OH)D concentration was significantly lower in ICU patients (median, 11.65 vs 18.25 ng/mL; P<0.00001), but no significant difference was noted between pregnant women (18.25 ng/mL) and healthy controls. The VDBP level was significantly lower in ICU patients (95.58 vs 167.18 μg/mL, P=0.0002) and higher in pregnant women (225.01 vs 167.18 μg/mL, P=0.008) compared with healthy controls. Nonetheless, the calculated bioavailable 25(OH)D levels of ICU patients and pregnant women were significantly lower than those of healthy controls (1.97 and 1.93 ng/mL vs 2.56 ng/mL; P=0.0073 and 0.0027).

conclusionsA single marker of the total 25(OH)D level is not sufficient to accurately evaluate vitamin D status, especially in pregnant women. In cases where VDBP concentrations may be altered, VDBP measurements and bioavailable 25(OH)D calculations may help to determine vitamin D status accurately.

Indexed as

AdultAgedChromatography, High Pressure LiquidEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnant PeopleSerum AlbuminTandem Mass SpectrometryVitamin DVitamin D-Binding ProteinSerum AlbuminVitamin DVitamin D-Binding Protein25-Hydroxyvitamin DBioavailabilityVitamin D-binding protein

Identifiers

PMID27834063
PMCPMC5107615
OpenAlexW2552278781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.