Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27834006›Full record

ArticleChromosoma2017

Centromere repositioning explains fundamental number variability in the New World monkey genus Saimiri.

Giorgia Chiatante, Oronzo Capozzi, Marta Svartman, Polina Perelman, Lucy Centrone, Svetlana S Romanenko, Takafumi Ishida, Mirela Valeri, Melody E Roelke-Parker, Roscoe Stanyon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pan-centromere reveals widespread centromere repositioning of soybean genomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Giorgia ChiatanteDepartment of Biology, Anthropology Laboratories, University of Florence, Via del Proconsolo 12, 50122, Florence, Italy.
Oronzo CapozziDepartment of Biology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Marta SvartmanDepartment of General Biology, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Polina PerelmanInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Lucy CentroneDepartment of Biology, Anthropology Laboratories, University of Florence, Via del Proconsolo 12, 50122, Florence, Italy.
Svetlana S RomanenkoInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Takafumi IshidaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mirela ValeriDepartment of General Biology, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Melody E Roelke-ParkerFrederick National Laboratory of Cancer Research, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc, Frederick, MD, USA.
Roscoe StanyonDepartment of Biology, Anthropology Laboratories, University of Florence, Via del Proconsolo 12, 50122, Florence, Italy. roscoe.stanyon@unifi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-7229-1092
University of Florence · ITInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology · RUUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRLeidos (United States) · USUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytogenetics has historically played a key role in research on squirrel monkey (genus Saimiri) evolutionary biology. Squirrel monkeys have a diploid number of 2n = 44, but vary in fundamental number (FN). Apparently, differences in FN have phylogenetic implications and are correlated with geographic regions. A number of hypothetical mechanisms were proposed to explain difference in FN: translocations, heterochromatin, or, most commonly, pericentric inversions. Recently, an additional mechanism, centromere repositioning, was discovered, which can alter chromosome morphology and FN. Here, we used chromosome banding, chromosome painting, and BAC-FISH to test these hypotheses. We demonstrate that centromere repositioning on chromosomes 5 and 15 is the mechanism that accounts for differences in FN. Current phylogenomic trees of platyrrhines provide a temporal framework for evolutionary new centromeres (ENC) in Saimiri. The X-chromosome ENC could be up to 15 million years (my) old that on chromosome 5 as recent as 0.3 my. The chromosome 15 ENC is intermediate, as young as 2.24 my. All ENC have abundant satellite DNAs indicating that the maturation process was fairly rapid. Callithrix jacchus was used as an outgroup for the BAC-FISH data analysis. Comparison with scaffolds from the S. boliviensis genome revealed an error in the last marmoset genome release. Future research including at the sequence level will provide better understanding of chromosome evolution in Saimiri and other platyrrhines. Probably other cases of differences in chromosome morphology and FN, both within and between taxa, will be shown to be due to centromere repositioning and not pericentric inversions.

Indexed as

KaryotypeAnimalsCentromereChromosome InversionChromosome PaintingCytogenetic AnalysisEvolution, MolecularPhylogenySaimiriTranslocation, GeneticBAC-FISHChromosome bandingChromosome rearrangementsEvolutionary new centromeresMolecular cytogeneticsPhylogenomics

Identifiers

PMID27834006
OpenAlexW2552988028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.