Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27833669›Full record

ArticleChemosensory perception2015

The Taste and Smell Protocol in the 2011-2014 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES): Test-Retest Reliability and Validity Testing.

Shristi Rawal, Howard J Hoffman, Mallory Honda, Tania B Huedo-Medin, Valerie B Duffy

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemosensory perception, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03726580 (Evaluation of Neurotoxic Effect of Sevoflurane-Based Anaesthesia Guided by Significant Short-Term Olfactory Identification Impairment in Old Age), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03726580 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Neurotoxic Effect of Sevoflurane-Based Anaesthesia Guided by Significant Short-Term Olfactory Identification Impairment in Old Age

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorTanta UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled600ConditionsNeurotoxic Effect of Sevoflurane-Based AnaesthesiaArmsSevoflurane
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Association between dietary zinc intake and olfactory dysfunction: a study based on the NHANES database.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Taste loss in cancer patients: clinicians' perceptions of educational materials and diagnostic tools.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Author's reply to the Letter to the Editor "The study of olfactory dysfunction in SARS-CoV-2 variants".European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shristi RawalDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, 358 Mansfield Road, Unit 1101, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Howard J HoffmanEpidemiology and Statistics Program, National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.
Mallory HondaDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, 358 Mansfield Road, Unit 1101, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Tania B Huedo-MedinDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, 358 Mansfield Road, Unit 1101, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Valerie B DuffyDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, 358 Mansfield Road, Unit 1101, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.

Funding

NIDCD NIH HHS Y01 DC000013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe US NHANES 2011-2014 protocol includes a taste and smell questionnaire (CSQ) in home-based interviews and brief assessments in mobile exam centers. We report the short- and longer-term test-retest reliability and validity of this protocol against broader chemosensory measures.

methodsA convenience sample of 73 adults (age=39.5±20.8 years) underwent the NHANES protocol at baseline, 2 weeks and 6 months. For taste, participants rated intensities of two tastants (1 M NaCl, 1 mM quinine) applied to the tongue tip and three tastants (1 M NaCl, 1 mM quinine, 0.32 M NaCl) sampled with the whole mouth. Smell function was assessed with a Pocket Smell Test™ (PST; eight-item odor identification test). The CSQ asked about chemosensory problems, distortions, and age-related changes. Broader baseline measurements were a 40-item olfactometer-generated identification task and additional whole-mouth taste intensities (1 M sucrose, 32 mM citric acid, 3.2 mM propylthiouracil).

resultsIntraclass correlations (

conclusionsThese findings further support that the NHANES chemosensory protocol has moderate-to-good test-retest reliability when administered to healthy, educated adults. Despite being a brief procedure with limited measures, the NHANES taste and smell assessments provided good information when compared to broader measures of taste and smell function.

Indexed as

BitterHealth statusNHANESPsychophysicsSmell perceptionTaste perception

Identifiers

PMID27833669
PMCPMC5100746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.