Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27833651›Full record

ArticleChild development perspectives2016

Embodiment and Human Development.

Peter J Marshall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child development perspectives, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Shared Origins of Embodiment and Development.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Making sense of movement in embodied design for mathematics learning.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2016
    Article
  11. Exploring in Silence: Hearing and Deaf Infants Explore Objects Differently before Cochlear Implantation.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter J MarshallTemple University.

Funding

The Neuroscience of Self-Other Correspondence in InfancyR21HD083756 · NICHD · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI MARSHALL, PETER J · 2015 to 2016
$290k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD083756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are recognizing increasingly that the study of cognitive, social, and emotional processes must account for their embodiment in living, acting beings. The related field of embodied cognition (EC) has coalesced around dissatisfaction with the lack of attention to the body in cognitive science. For developmental scientists, the emphasis in the literature on adult EC on the role of the body in cognition may not seem particularly novel, given that bodily action was central to Piaget's theory of cognitive development. However, as the influence of the Piagetian account waned, developmental notions of embodiment were shelved in favor of mechanical computational approaches. In this article, I argue that by reconsidering embodiment, we can address a key issue with computational accounts: how meaning is constructed by the developing person. I also suggest that the process-relational approach to developmental systems can provide a system of concepts for framing a fully embodied, integrative developmental science.

Indexed as

developmentembodimentmeaning

Identifiers

PMID27833651
PMCPMC5098554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.