Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27833487›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia

Measurement of endotracheal tube cuff pressure: Instrumental versus conventional method.

Mueen Ullah Khan, Rashid Khokar, Sadia Qureshi, Tariq Al Zahrani, Mansoor Aqil, Motasim Shiraz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of audible leakMedical gas research
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Disposable Airway Pressure Manometers for Endotracheal Tube Cuff Inflation.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mueen Ullah KhanDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rashid KhokarDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sadia QureshiDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Tariq Al ZahraniDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mansoor AqilDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Motasim ShirazDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the conventional practice of endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff inflation and pressure measurement as compared to the instrumental method. STUDY

designProspective observational study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Department of Anaesthesia, King Saud University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (June 2014-July 2014).

methodsA total of 100 adult patients were observed according to the syringe size used Group-1 (10 ml) and Group-2 (20 ml) for ETT cuff inflation in general anesthesia. Patients with anticipated difficult intubation, risk for aspiration, known anatomical laryngotracheal abnormalities, and emergency cases were excluded. Trachea was intubated with size 8 or 8.5 mm and 7.0 or 7.5 mm ETT in male and female patients respectively. The ETT cuff was inflated with air by one of the anesthesia technician. Cuff pressures were measured using aneroid manometer. ETT cuff pressure of 20-30 cm of water was considered as standard.

resultsIn 69% of the patients, the cuff pressure measurements were above the standard. Age (

conclusionThe conventional method for ETT cuff inflation and pressure measuring is unreliable. As a routine instrumental cuff pressure, monitoring is suggested.

Indexed as

Cuff pressureendotracheal tubemeasurement

Identifiers

PMID27833487
PMCPMC5044728
OpenAlexW2325199764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.