Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27833454›Full record

ArticleQualitative research : QR2016

Hiring the experts: best practices for community-engaged research.

Lisa J Hardy, Amy Hughes, Elizabeth Hulen, Alejandra Figueroa, Coral Evans, R Cruz Begay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative research : QR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Developing an implementation fidelity measure for a family healthy weight program.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Supporting New Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa J HardyNorthern Arizona University, USA.
Amy HughesNorthern Arizona University, USA.
Elizabeth HulenNorthern Arizona University, USA.
Alejandra FigueroaFlagstaff Medical Center, USA.
Coral EvansSunnyside Neighborhood Association, USA.
R Cruz BegayNorthern Arizona University, USA.

Funding

Research Training/Education CoreP20MD006872 · NIMHD · NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY · PI GLOWACKA, MARIA, TEUFEL-SHONE, NICOLETTE I · 2012 to 2016
$6.1M
NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD006872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-engaged approaches to research and practice continue to show success in addressing health equity and making long-term change for partnership relationships and structures of power. The usefulness of these approaches is either diminished or bolstered by community trust, which can be challenging for partnerships to achieve. In this research note we present an example process for recruiting, interviewing, and hiring community researchers as a starting place for capacity building and for laying the foundation for data collection and analysis in health-related community projects.

Indexed as

community-engaged researchhealth equityhealth partnershipsmedical anthropologyqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID27833454
PMCPMC5100673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.