Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27833181›Full record

ReviewThe Linacre quarterly2016

Does levonorgestrel emergency contraceptive have a post-fertilization effect? A review of its mechanism of action.

Rebecca Peck, Walter Rella, Julio Tudela, Justo Aznar, Bruno Mozzanega

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Linacre quarterly, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Rebecca PeckFlorida State University, College of Medicine, Daytona Beach, Florida, USA.
Walter RellaInstitut für Medizinische Anthropologie und Bioethik (IMABE), Wien, Austria.
Julio TudelaObservatory Bioethics of the Catholic University of Valencia, Spain.
Justo AznarLife Sciences Institute of the Catholic University of Valencia, Spain.
Bruno MozzanegaGynecology in the Department of Woman's and Child's Health, University of Padua, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University of Padova, Italy.
Universitat de València · ESFlorida State University · USUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies have identified that levonorgestrel administered orally in emergency contraception (LNG-EC) is only efficacious when taken before ovulation. However, the drug does not consistently prevent follicular rupture or impair sperm function.

objectiveThe present systematic review is performed to analyze and more precisely define the extent to which pre-fertilization mechanisms of action may explain the drug's efficacy in pregnancy avoidance. We also examine the available evidence to determine if pre-ovulatory drug administration may be associated with post-fertilization effects.

conclusionThe mechanism of action of LNG-EC is reviewed. The drug has no ability to alter sperm function at doses used LAY SUMMARY: Plan B is the most widely used emergency contraceptive available. It is important for patients and physicians to clearly understand the drug's mechanism of action (MOA). The drug was originally thought to work by preventing fertilization. Recent research has cast doubt on this. Our review of the research suggests that it could act in a pre-fertilization capacity, and we estimate that it could prevent ovulation in only 15 percent or less of cases. The drug has no ability to alter sperm function and limited ability to suppress ovulation. Further, data suggest that when administered pre-ovulation, it may have a post-fertilization MOA.

Indexed as

Inhibition of ovulationLevonorgestrel emergency contraceptionLuteal dysfunctionMechanism of actionPre- and post-fertilization effects

Identifiers

PMID27833181
PMCPMC5102184
OpenAlexW2165034002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.