ArticleImmunology and cell biology2017
Divergent macrophage responses to Mycobacterium bovis among naturally exposed uninfected and infected cattle.
Article in Immunology and cell biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunopathogenesis of tuberculosis: cellular mechanisms and immune modulation.Veterinary research · 2025Review
- Alveolar Macrophage Chromatin Is Modified to Orchestrate Host Response toFrontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Early clearance versus control: what is the meaning of a negative tuberculin skin test or interferon-gamma release assay following exposure toF1000Research · 2018Review
- Nitric Oxide in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Tuberculosis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mycobacterium bovis, the causative agent of bovine tuberculosis (TB), is a successful pathogen that remains an important global threat to livestock. Cattle naturally exposed to M. bovis normally become reactive to the M. bovis-purified protein derivative (tuberculin) skin test; however, some individuals remain negative, suggesting that they may be resistant to infection. To better understand host innate resistance to infection, 26 cattle from herds with a long history of high TB prevalence were included in this study. We investigated the bactericidal activity, the production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and the TB-related gene expression profile after in vitro M. bovis challenge of monocyte-derived macrophages from cattle with TB (n=17) and from non-infected, exposed cattle (in-contacts, n=9). The disease status was established based on the tuberculin skin test and blood interferon-gamma test responses, the presence of visible lesions at inspection on abattoirs and the histopathology and culture of M. bovis. Although macrophages from TB-infected cattle enabled M. bovis replication, macrophages from healthy, exposed cattle had twofold lower bacterial loads, overproduced nitric oxide and had lower interleukin (IL)-10 gene expression (P⩽0.05). Higher mRNA expression levels of inducible nitric oxide synthase, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 and IL-12 were observed in macrophages from all in-contact cattle than in macrophages from their TB-infected counterparts, which expressed more tumour necrosis factor-α; however, the differences were not statistically significant owing to individual variation. These results confirm that macrophage bactericidal responses have a crucial role in innate resistance to M. bovis infection in cattle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.