ArticleLancet (London, England)2017
Better life through medicine-let's leave no one behind.
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Economic evaluation of orphan drug Lutetium-Octreotate vs. Octreotide long-acting release for patients with an advanced midgut neuroendocrine tumour in the Netherlands.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021Article
- Pharmaceutical expenditure control in Europe: time to move from pricing to budgeting?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2020Review
- Precision medicine and monoclonal antibodies: breach of promise?Croatian medical journal · 2019Article
- Pharmaceutical pricing conundrum: time to get rid of it?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2018Article
- Defining Success in Open Science [version 2; peer review:2 approved].MNI open research · 2018Article
- Data exclusivity exceptions and compulsory licensing to promote generic medicines in the European Union:Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2017Review
- A Healthy Sense of Trust.Biomedicine hubReview
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27832876What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.