Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27832769›Full record

ReviewBMC psychiatry2016

Care planning for consumers on community treatment orders: an integrative literature review.

Suzanne Dawson, Sharon Lawn, Alan Simpson, Eimear Muir-Cochrane

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Supported decision-making interventions in mental healthcare: A systematic review of current evidence and implementation barriers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Trust and Community Treatment Orders.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Suzanne DawsonSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, Australia. Suzanne.dawson@flinders.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7357-625X
Sharon LawnSchool of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Alan SimpsonSchool of Health Sciences, Nursing, City University London, London, UK.
Eimear Muir-CochraneSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, Australia.
Flinders University · AUCity, University of London · GB

Funding

Department of Health 11/2004/12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCase management is the established model for care provision in mental health and is delivered within current care philosophies of person-centred and recovery-oriented care. The fact that people with a mental illness may be forced to receive care and treatment in the community poses challenges for clinicians aiming to engage in approaches that promote shared decision-making and self-determination. This review sought to gain an in-depth understanding of stakeholders' perspectives and experiences of care planning for consumers' on CTOs.

methodsAn integrative review method allowed for inclusion of a broad range of studies from diverse empirical sources. Systematic searches were conducted across six databases. Following appraisal, findings from included papers were coded into groups and presented against a framework of case management.

resultsForty-eight papers were included in the review. Empirical studies came from seven countries, with the majority reporting on qualitative methods. Many similarities were reported across studies. Positive gains from CTOs were usually associated with the nature of support received, highlighting the importance of the therapeutic relationship in care planning. Key gaps in care planning included a lack of connection between CTO, treatment and consumer goals and lack of implementation of focussed interventions.

conclusionsCurrent case management processes could be better utilised for consumers on CTOs, with exploration of how this could be achieved warranted. Workers need to be sensitive to the 'control and care' dynamic in the care planning relationship, with person-centred approaches requiring core and advanced practitioner and communication skills, including empathy and trust.

Indexed as

Case ManagementMandatory ProgramsHumansMental DisordersCare PlanningCase ManagementCommunity Mental HealthCommunity Treatment Orders

Identifiers

PMID27832769
PMCPMC5105250
OpenAlexW2554594096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.