Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27832752›Full record

Observational studyBMC family practice2016

More primary care patients regret health decisions if they experienced decisional conflict in the consultation: a secondary analysis of a multicenter descriptive study.

Maria-Margarita Becerra-Perez, Matthew Menear, Stephane Turcotte, Michel Labrecque, France Légaré

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC family practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Extent and Predictors of Decision Regret among Informal Caregivers Making Decisions for a Loved One: A Systematic Review.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Timing of ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: A survey of the patient perspective in the 'biological' era.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Physician Well-being and the Future of Health Information Technology.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria-Margarita Becerra-PerezCHU de Québec Research Centre -Laval University, St-François d'Assise Hospital, 10 de l'Espinay, Quebec City, QC, G1L 3L5, Canada. maria-margarita.becerra-perez.1@ulaval.ca.
Matthew MenearCHU de Québec Research Centre -Laval University, St-François d'Assise Hospital, 10 de l'Espinay, Quebec City, QC, G1L 3L5, Canada.
Stephane TurcotteCHU de Québec Research Centre -Laval University, St-François d'Assise Hospital, 10 de l'Espinay, Quebec City, QC, G1L 3L5, Canada.
Michel LabrecqueCHU de Québec Research Centre -Laval University, St-François d'Assise Hospital, 10 de l'Espinay, Quebec City, QC, G1L 3L5, Canada.
France LégaréCHU de Québec Research Centre -Laval University, St-François d'Assise Hospital, 10 de l'Espinay, Quebec City, QC, G1L 3L5, Canada. france.legare@mfa.ulaval.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe sought to estimate the extent of decision regret among primary care patients and identify risk factors associated with regret.

methodsSecondary analysis of an observational descriptive study conducted in two Canadian provinces. Unique patient-physician dyads were recruited from 17 primary care clinics and data on patient, physician and consultation characteristics were collected before, during and immediately after consultations, as well as two weeks post-consultation, when patients completed the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). We examined the DRS score distribution and performed ordinal logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of regret.

resultsAmong 258 unique patient-physicians dyads, mean ± standard deviation of decision regret scores was 11.7 ± 15.1 out of 100. Overall, 43 % of patients reported no regret, 45 % reported mild regret and 12 % reported moderate to strong regret. In multivariate analyses, higher decision regret was strongly associated with increased decisional conflict and less significantly associated with patient age and education, as well with male (vs. female) physicians and residents (vs. teachers).

conclusionAfter consulting family physicians, most primary care patients experience little decision regret, but some experience more regret if there is decisional conflict. Strategies for reducing decisional conflict in primary care, such as shared decision-making with decision aids, seem warranted.

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalDecision MakingFamily PracticePrimary Health CareAdultAgedAge FactorsEducational StatusEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPhysician-Patient RelationsSex FactorsDecisional conflictDecision regretDyadsPrimary careRisk factorsShared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID27832752
PMCPMC5103443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.